"Urban renewal" has emerged as a real alternative to prevent potential earthquake damages. Since Turkey is located in the seismic zone and exposed to severe earthquakes, there has been a great need for urban renewal projects in the last 20 years. As a result of this need, urban renewal projects have constituted an important proportion of the growth in the Turkish construction industry. Selecting the right urban renewal project is one of the vital decisions for contractors as they are taking more risk than the other parties. However, it is a challenging and time-consuming process as there are various compromising and conflicting that need to be considered simultaneously. Therefore, this selection problem should be considered as a multi-attributedecision-making (MADM) process. The main objectives of this study are to propose an integrated approach, which uses the combination of different MADM methods, for selection of urban renewal projects in Turkey, and to compare the findings of these methods with each other. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method was combined with Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), VlseKriterijuska Optimizacija I Komoromisno Resenje (VIKOR), COmplex PRoportional Assessment (COPRAS), and Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) methods. In the proposed approach, AHP was used to calculate the weights of the criteria that may affect the urban renewal project selection decision and the other MADM methods were used to rank the alternative projects. A case study was carried out in order to illustrate how the integrated approach can be applied in a real-life problem. The findings of using these methods were compared to each other. Application of the proposed approach revealed that it can be a useful tool in selecting urban renewal projects.