2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.08.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling continuous integration practice differences in industry software development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
99
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
99
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Continuous integration as an agile practice (Beck et al 2001) enables early identification of integration issues as well as increases the developers' productivity and release frequency (Ståhl and Bosch 2014). With this reasoning, as reported elsewhere (Linåker et al 2015), we deem that the product innovations captured in Jenkins and Gerrit transfer on as process innovation to Sony Mobile's product development.…”
Section: Innovation Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Continuous integration as an agile practice (Beck et al 2001) enables early identification of integration issues as well as increases the developers' productivity and release frequency (Ståhl and Bosch 2014). With this reasoning, as reported elsewhere (Linåker et al 2015), we deem that the product innovations captured in Jenkins and Gerrit transfer on as process innovation to Sony Mobile's product development.…”
Section: Innovation Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In their 2014 systematic review, Ståhl and Bosch provided the most recent overview over CI practices and how they differ in various settings of industrial software development [17]. Of particular interest to us is their analysis of what is considered a failure in a CI build.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The broader use context envisaged for our tools is Service Centred Continuous Engineering [5], which extends the continuous design and continuous deployment of [105] to a continuous lifecycle support paradigm where users co-define and co-manage the design and the evolution of deployed systems. This approach requires the coherent support of different levels of expertise and different concerns among the cooperating participants, and thus requires adaptability also of the technological means, including the design environment (like the jABC) itself.…”
Section: Cinco: Generating Tailored Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%