Modeling Container-grown Euphorbia pulcherrima Production System Components: Impacts on Carbon Footprint and Variable Costs Using a Life Cycle Assessment

Abstract

Additional index words. floriculture crops, poinsettia, global warming potential, costs of production Abstract. A model production system for a 15.2-cm poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima) in the north Atlantic region of the United States was developed through grower interviews and best management practices and analyzed using a life cycle assessment (LCA). The model system involved direct sticking of unrooted cuttings. The propagation phase was 4 weeks, followed by 9 weeks of irrigation using a boom system and 4 weeks of flood-floor irrigation. The carbon footprint, or global warming potential (GWP), for the plant was calculated as 0.474 kg carbon dioxide equivalent (kg CO 2 e), with a variable cost of $1.030. Major contributors to the GWP were the substrate and filling pots, fertilization, the container, irrigation, and overhead electricity. The major contributors to variable costs were the unrooted cuttings and labor to prepare and stick ($0.471). Furthermore, the substrate and filling containers and irrigation were notable contributors. Material inputs accounted for 0.304 kg CO 2 e, whereas equipment use was estimated to be 0.163 kg CO 2 e, which comprised 64.2% and 35.8% of total GWP, respectively. Material inputs accounted for $0.665 (64.6%) of variable costs, whereas labor accounted for 19.6% of variable costs for this model. Water use per plant was 77.2 L with boom irrigation for the 9 weeks during production spacing (32.8 plant/m 2 ) and represented 64% of the total water use. LCA was an effective tool for analyzing the components of a model system of greenhouse-grown, flowering, potted plants. Information gained from this study can be used by growers considering system alterations to improve efficiency.

Environmental Impact of Edible Flower Production: A Case Study

“…However, Fusi et al [24] assessed the processing phase too, which was not present in the nursery's production process, in conclusion, the GWP values of edible flowers resulted in being higher than those found for lettuce. Comparisons with cut flowers' production were not possible, due to the different functional units used; however we expect the cut flowers' values to be higher, as there are more inputs used, such as fertilizers, fungicides, insecticides, pesticides, and gasoline and electricity for machinery and plant growth regulators [22,30].…”

A Comparison of Irrigation-Water Containment Methods and Management Strategies Between Two Ornamental Production Systems to Minimize Water Security Threats

“…Ingram et al [49] provided a life-cycle analysis for poinsettia using data from case study A to illustrate the water and energy footprints of this popular ornamental crop. They documented that each poinsettia plant, produced in a highly water-efficient greenhouse, used 121 L over 16 weeks.…”

Daily Water Requirement of Container Grown Davallia bullata and Nephrolepis exaltata and Implication in Irrigation Practices

“…Over irrigation has been documented to cause 25% to 90% of applied water to be either leached or runoff [9,10]. The production of poinsettia in a highly water-efficient greenhouse used 121 L of water over a 16-week production period [11]. Third, leachate and/or runoff water contains nutrients, largely nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) [12,13].…”