Modeling Collaborative Processes with CMMN: Success or Failure? An Experience Report

Routis, Ioannis; Νικολαϊδου, Μάρα; Anagnostopoulos, Dimosthenis

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91704-7_13

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…That way, the appropriate users will be notified for either the category change proposal or the commenting in an advertisement. Finally, registered users have a profile in which they are able to be notified for any recycling actions taken via a news‐feed as well as being informed for general topics regarding recycling and its benefits.” (Routis et al, 2018).…”

Section: Empirical Evaluation Studymentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Finally, registered users have a profile in which they are able to be notified for any recycling actions taken via a news-feed as well as being informed for general topics regarding recycling and its benefits." (Routis et al, 2018).…”

Section: Cmmn Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Considering that in a knowledge/data‐driven economy all organizations will realize that they should transform and handle many of their processes as KiPs (Al‐Omoush et al, 2020; Batra, 2020), we believe it is important to evaluate a standard language as CMMN for KiPs modeling, before exploring alternative approaches (K. Swenson, 2018), and conclude on its applicability. Hence, we aspire that this research is a first step to assess whether CMMN can be utilized for modeling KiPs, though advances should be explored on the environments/tools supporting KiPs execution (Routis et al, 2018; Swenson, 2018). We chose to work in an empirical manner with real modelers and we value their opinion because we believe that the future users of CMMN can give reliable insights on the fit of the language for KiPs modeling.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Exploring CMMN applicability to knowledge‐intensive process modeling: An empirical evaluation by modelers

Routis

Bardaki

Νικολαϊδου

et al. 2022

Knowl Process Manag

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Knowledge‐intensive processes (KiPs) have emerged characterizing tasks that are data‐driven, change dynamically and depend on the knowledge and experience of knowledge workers. Case Management Model and Notation (CMMN) language was introduced for modeling unstructured, agile human‐centric processes. As the available Business Process Modeling (BPM) methods and practices are not adequate for modeling KiPs, this paper presents an empirical study of the applicability of CMMN to modeling KiPs. After experienced modelers designed the models of three KiPs scenarios utilizing CMMN, their perceptions were collected assessing the support of CMMN to the KiPs characteristics. Specifically, the modelers assessed the support of the newly introduced CMMN notation elements to the KiPs characteristics. Three of them, that is, knowledge‐driven, unpredictable, and goal‐oriented, were highlighted as the ones that get the greater support by CMMN when it comes to modeling KiPs; the participating modelers suggested that the applicability of CMMN to modeling KiPs is mostly reinforced by the Sentries element. Considering that in a knowledge‐driven economy, organizations are called to transform their way of thinking and manage KiPs, we value the modelers' opinions since they shall apply such practices in the future. This research is a first step to assess whether CMMN may be a “fit” for modeling KiPs. When considering the potential of CMMN for KiPs modeling, the perceptions of such real CMMN users are also first indications of the CMMN future in terms of application.

show abstract

Section: Empirical Evaluation Studymentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Cmmn Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Exploring CMMN applicability to knowledge‐intensive process modeling: An empirical evaluation by modelers

Routis

Bardaki

Νικολαϊδου

et al. 2022

Knowl Process Manag

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Pemodelan BPMN lebih berfokus kepada proses bisnis sebuah organisasi [13] [14]. BPMN kurang cocok untuk digunakan pada pemodelan yang tidak terstruktur, bersifat human collaborative [15], emergency dan fleksibel dalam penyelesaiannya [16] Penelitian ini menggunakan uji validitas kepada pakar bencana di BPBD DIY. Uji validitas dilakukan untuk 2 model yang divisualisasikan dengan Mockup.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Disaster Response Modeling Base on Landslide Early Warning Using Case Management Model and Notation

Ekamas

Putro

Dirgahayu

2022

J. Tek. Inform. (JUTIF)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There are a few handling steps in the emergency response to landslides that need thorough explanation. The flexibility of emergency response situations is ineffectively supported by traditional modeling methodologies because they are excessively inflexible. Companies have traditionally modeled their business processes using the Business Process Management Approach and Notation (BPMN) model. For design case management, such as the emergency reaction to a landslide disaster, BPMN modeling is unsuitable. because the BPMN modeling focuses how business processes flow inside a company. The Case Management Model and Notation (CMMN), the newest modeling approach from the Object Management Group (OMG), was launched in 2013 with the purpose of completing the BPMN modeling approach. The unstructured and adaptable CMMN claims to be able to handle urgent situations. This study's intention is to develop a CMMN model of a landslide emergency reaction scenario based on an emergency alert from an Early Warning System (EWS) sensor. In order to acquire the qualitative data for this study, the researcher first conducted a literature review. Then used the interview and observation methods to gather data, and from this data, we created the model using the CMMN modeling approach. The Yogyakarta Special Region Disaster Management Agency's (BPBD DIY) data flow of a disaster management information system, which was already operational, was analyzed by researchers. Then, the researchers used CMMN to model the data in order to find out opportunities to improve the disaster management information system already in use at BPBD DIY. Two CMMN models—the BPBD DIY disaster management information system model and the recommendation model for system improvements—were created in this study. The analysis of the current disaster management information system model resulted in the recomendation of this model. A prototype of feature recommendation is created as part of this research and given to specialists in natural disasters for model validation.

show abstract

Enforcing a Cross-Organizational Workflow: An Experience Report

Stahnke

Shumaiev

Cuéllar

et al. 2020

Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Modeling Collaborative Processes with CMMN: Success or Failure? An Experience Report

Cited by 8 publications

References 9 publications

Exploring CMMN applicability to knowledge‐intensive process modeling: An empirical evaluation by modelers

Exploring CMMN applicability to knowledge‐intensive process modeling: An empirical evaluation by modelers

Disaster Response Modeling Base on Landslide Early Warning Using Case Management Model and Notation

Enforcing a Cross-Organizational Workflow: An Experience Report

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About