AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies (MST) Conference 2013
DOI: 10.2514/6.2013-5223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Coherence Zones in Flight Simulation During Yaw Motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This signal-dependent noise characteristic was measured from experimental data in [12], and it is consistent with perception tests carried out in the literature [24][25][26][27][28]. However, these studies generally focussed on sinusoidal stimuli with a single frequency.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This signal-dependent noise characteristic was measured from experimental data in [12], and it is consistent with perception tests carried out in the literature [24][25][26][27][28]. However, these studies generally focussed on sinusoidal stimuli with a single frequency.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In other words, the width of the band for which Pr(C | e V , e I ) is relatively high is predicted by the sum of the sensory variances. This theoretical result corresponds to empirical findings on the width of the CZ for yaw rotations [45]. Fig.…”
Section: Multisensory Distance Estimationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The concept was derived from the observation that physically moving observers are unable to detect concurrent visual motion when the amplitude of the visual motion is below a particular threshold [39,40]. CZ have been determined for the amplitude and phase of rotational as well as translation motion [41,42,43,44,45], and also for heading [46,30]. CI models can be said to be formed around an analogous concept, namely the probability that visual and inertial motion with any discrepancy will be attributed to a common cause Pr(C | e V , e I ).…”
Section: Multisensory Distance Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%