1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(98)00093-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling CO2 degassing and pH in a stream–aquifer system

Abstract: Pinal Creek, Arizona receives an inflow of ground water with high dissolved inorganic carbon (57-75 mg/l) and low pH (5.8-6.3). There is an observed increase of in-stream pH from approximately 6.0-7.8 over the 3 km downstream of the point of groundwater inflow. We hypothesized that CO 2 gas-exchange was the most important factor causing the pH increase in this stream-aquifer system. An existing transport model, for coupled ground water-surface water systems (OTIS), was modified to include carbonate equilibria … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(15 reference statements)
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stream-water chemistry is characterized by high dissolved solids (e.g., 11-14 mM SO 4 À2 and 8-12 mM Ca 2+ ) and elevated dissolved Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn. Stream water pH increases from about 6 near the head of perennial flow to about 7.8 at Inspiration Dam due to CO 2 outgassing (Choi et al, 1998). Dissolved Mn concentrations in stream and shallow ground water increased from background levels in 1984 to levels approaching 1.3 mM by 1990 with little subsequent change through 1999 .…”
Section: Pinal Creek Site Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stream-water chemistry is characterized by high dissolved solids (e.g., 11-14 mM SO 4 À2 and 8-12 mM Ca 2+ ) and elevated dissolved Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn. Stream water pH increases from about 6 near the head of perennial flow to about 7.8 at Inspiration Dam due to CO 2 outgassing (Choi et al, 1998). Dissolved Mn concentrations in stream and shallow ground water increased from background levels in 1984 to levels approaching 1.3 mM by 1990 with little subsequent change through 1999 .…”
Section: Pinal Creek Site Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flux of groundwater also must be considered in streams where the effect of groundwater on oxygen mass balance is large relative to rates of biological processes and reaeration, or metabolism will be estimated with error. Odum (1956) considered the potential effects of groundwater flux on the mass balance of oxygen in streams, and more recent work (Choi et al 1998;Jones and Mulholland 1998) has demonstrated empirically that flux of groundwater can greatly affect gas concentrations in streams, but the effects of flux on estimates of stream metabolism have not been examined explicitly. Although practitioners of the open-channel method (e.g., Marzolf et al 1994;Uehlinger and Naegeli 1998;Fellows et al 2001) often have attempted to confine their work to reaches where rates of groundwater flux are low, the potential for error in open-channel estimates of metabolism has not been studied.…”
Section: Effects Of Groundwater Flux On Open-channel Estimates Of Strmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While physically-based models for simulation of conservative natural tracers may be used as a starting point in the context of CO 2 (e.g. Choi et al, 1998), parameterisation of such models is difficult (Genereux and Variability of dissolved CO 2 in the Pang and Lambourn Chalk river s Hemond, 1992) and extraneous processes of CO 2 production, CO 2 degassing and carbonate precipitation are still not addressed. Indeed, Finlay (2003), suggests that even the presence of canopy cover above streams can affect the temporal dynamics of dissolved CO 2 significantly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%