2015
DOI: 10.5849/forsci.13-190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Climatic Effects on Stand Height/Site Index of Plantation-Grown Jack Pine and Black Spruce Trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
1
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
52
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The site-specific and assumed density-independent relationship between the stand height and age is central to the phytocentric approach used to estimate the productivity of even-aged monospecific boreal stand-types (e.g., site index as defined as the mean dominant height or top height at a specified index or base age [23,24,28]). Stand height is traditionally defined as the mean height of the dominant trees within a stand (e.g., mean height of the tallest trees within the upper quintile of the height distribution and traditionally denoted mean dominant height) or as the mean height of the trees with the largest diameters in a stand (e.g., mean height of the trees within the upper quintile of the diameter distribution which is traditionally denoted top height).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The site-specific and assumed density-independent relationship between the stand height and age is central to the phytocentric approach used to estimate the productivity of even-aged monospecific boreal stand-types (e.g., site index as defined as the mean dominant height or top height at a specified index or base age [23,24,28]). Stand height is traditionally defined as the mean height of the dominant trees within a stand (e.g., mean height of the tallest trees within the upper quintile of the height distribution and traditionally denoted mean dominant height) or as the mean height of the trees with the largest diameters in a stand (e.g., mean height of the trees within the upper quintile of the diameter distribution which is traditionally denoted top height).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, similar to other models that attempt to project the effects of the future climate, the biophysical models are being used outside of the range of their underlying calibration data sets. Reviewing the values given in Table 1 of Sharma and others [16], indicates that the precipitation and temperature values for their sample sites ranged from a minimum of 403 mm to a maximum of 502 mm, and from 12.0 to 13.4 • C, respectively. Contrasting these values with those given in Table 1 (490 to 577 mm for precipitation and 12.5 to 17.0 • C for temperature), suggest that there is a significant risk of projection error given the power exponent's functional dependence on these variables (Equations (1) and (2)).…”
Section: Modelling Approach and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Additionally, more elaborate biophysical models which directly account for GHG concentrations have also been developed and incorporated into stand-level decision-support systems (e.g., SILVA [7]). With respect to the modified SSDMMs presented in this study, Sharma and others [16] evaluated the significance of including additional climate variables into the biophysical height-age model specifications and concluded that adding variables such as soil-moisture related variables, would not significantly improve the explanatory performance of their models (e.g., final model forms explained over 98% of the variation in the dependent variables). …”
Section: Modelling Approach and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations