2022
DOI: 10.1097/hs9.0000000000000679
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Benefits, Costs, and Affordability of a Novel Gene Therapy in Hemophilia A

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(224 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of the five models are presented in Table 4 . Machin et al and Ten Ham et al 81 , 85 conducted a 10-year time horizon starting at approximately 30 years of age. Cook et al 82 presented the latter as a scenario analysis which we use here for comparability purposes.…”
Section: Considerations For Successful Implementation Of Gene Therapy...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results of the five models are presented in Table 4 . Machin et al and Ten Ham et al 81 , 85 conducted a 10-year time horizon starting at approximately 30 years of age. Cook et al 82 presented the latter as a scenario analysis which we use here for comparability purposes.…”
Section: Considerations For Successful Implementation Of Gene Therapy...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in costs to control and treat bleeds were driven by major variations in 1) the dosing protocol which varied in the number of units and number of administered doses for prophylaxis and different types of bleeds ( Table 4 ), 2) the assumed weight of the prototypical patient which ranged between 81.4 and 90.2 kg, 3) the FVIII unit cost which ranged between $0.79/IU (discounted) and $1.63/IU (Wholesale Acquisition Cost), and 4) the costing perspective and discounting rate used in the model. Ten Ham et al 85 was the only model that adopted a societal perspective meaning that more cost categories like productivity loss were considered. However, it was also the only model that discounted costs at an annual rate of 4% compared to 3% for the two other models.…”
Section: Considerations For Successful Implementation Of Gene Therapy...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potentially these will further improve patient outcomes but cost and benefit for patients and society are yet unclear. The effectiveness, (long term) side effects, and therefore positioning and optimal use of these new treatments are still to be established 21 . In addition, we are obligated to identify which patients will benefit from which therapeutic approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent cost-effective analysis calculated a break-even time of 8 years for valoctocogene roxaparvovec, assuming an annual FVIII decrease of 5.7%. 6 This decrease was based on the earlier BioMarin trial in 15 patients. 4 With the phase 3 data now available, it is clear that this decline seems too optimistic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%