2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2012.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and validation of on-road CO2 emissions inventories at the urban regional scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences between statewide fuel sales and fuel quantities accounted for as outlined above (accounting for ~20–30% of fuel use) are assigned to remaining portions of the roadway network (i.e., those roads without traffic count data), using road length as a proxy. This is done separately for urban and rural grid cells to ensure that rural emissions are not overestimated, as travel on rural roads is expected to be lower [ Brondfield et al ., ]. For example, in California ~30% of total vehicle travel occurs on roads without traffic counts, and of this subset ~90% is urban and ~10% is rural (Table S1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences between statewide fuel sales and fuel quantities accounted for as outlined above (accounting for ~20–30% of fuel use) are assigned to remaining portions of the roadway network (i.e., those roads without traffic count data), using road length as a proxy. This is done separately for urban and rural grid cells to ensure that rural emissions are not overestimated, as travel on rural roads is expected to be lower [ Brondfield et al ., ]. For example, in California ~30% of total vehicle travel occurs on roads without traffic counts, and of this subset ~90% is urban and ~10% is rural (Table S1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy usually entails measuring trace gas mixing ratios from a ground-based vehicle either on public roads (e.g., Maness et al, 2015) or private roads in partnership with the facility owner (e.g., Roscioli et al, 2015). Existing studies often target oil and gas facilities (e.g., Roscioli et al, 2015;Brantley et al, 2014;Jackson et al, 2014;Lan et al, 2015;Mitchell et al, 2015;Subramanian et al, 2015) and mobile CO 2 emissions (e.g., Brondfield et al, 2012;Maness et al, 2015). In the case of oil and gas emissions, Brantley et al (2014) explain that mobile measurements capture an integrated plume that includes all leaks from a given facility but rarely indicate which components caused those leaks.…”
Section: Recent Direct Measurements That Support Bottom-up Effortsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals' vehicle travel was found to be best predicted by household income, vehicle ownership, and commuting distance, and the estimated relationships have been used to impute on-road emissions at the zip code level (20). Directly measured roadway CO 2 concentrations have also been parsimoniously modeled using only the local fraction of impervious surface and a traffic volume-weighted road density index (21). In selected US states and cities, local traffic count data and state-level fuel consumption have been used to downscale emissions to a 500-m grid (22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%