2011
DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2011.600785
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and Validation of Nanoparticle Charging Efficiency of a Single-Wire Corona Unipolar Charger

Abstract: A single-wire corona unipolar aerosol charger with a sheath air to avoid particle loss was designed and experimental charging efficiencies were obtained at a fixed aerosol flow rate of 1 L/min using monodisperse silver nanoparticles of 2.5 to 20 nm in diameter. The charger has a cylindrical casing of 30 mm in inner diameter in which a gold wire of 50 µm in diameter and 2 mm in length is used as the discharge electrode. A two-dimensional (2-D) numerical model was developed to predict nanoparticle charging effic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of its simple design, the specific design allowed relatively small diffusion and electrostatic losses since the small effective charging volume in comparison with other typical designs. As a consequence, the extrinsic charging efficiency attainable was higher than published similar devices of Chen and Pui (1999), Tsai et al (2010), Chien et al (2011), etc. for particle size in the range 5-10 nm while for smaller particles the charging efficiencies was slightly lower than those attainable chargers with sheath air to reduce particle diffusion losses.…”
Section: Recent Progresses In Unipolar Charger Designmentioning
confidence: 46%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In spite of its simple design, the specific design allowed relatively small diffusion and electrostatic losses since the small effective charging volume in comparison with other typical designs. As a consequence, the extrinsic charging efficiency attainable was higher than published similar devices of Chen and Pui (1999), Tsai et al (2010), Chien et al (2011), etc. for particle size in the range 5-10 nm while for smaller particles the charging efficiencies was slightly lower than those attainable chargers with sheath air to reduce particle diffusion losses.…”
Section: Recent Progresses In Unipolar Charger Designmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Towards the practical application of numerical techniques, Chien et al (2011Chien et al ( , 2013) developed a two-dimensional (2D) numerical model to predict the charging process in real unipolar chargers with complex geometries, which contains the fully coupled calculation of flow field, electric potential and ion concentration fields, and the charging dynamics of airborne particles. Methods for calculating the fields is based on the work of Lin and Tsai et al (2010), while the charging model developed by Marlow and Brock (1975) was adopted to calculate the particle charging efficiency, and good agreement between the predicted and experimental charging efficiencies was obtained.…”
Section: (2) Numerical Modelling Of Unipolar Chargersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Fern andez-D ıaz and Domat (2014) argued in their Comment that the geometry of the discharge electrode of the charger was a needle but not a wire, and hence the boundary condition for the ionic charge density at the discharge wire surface used in the simulation was not completely correct. They proposed a methodology to replace Equation (9) in Chien et al (2011) for improving the simulated results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the irregular internal geometry of the charging chamber, no simple mathematical models were available to describe the electrical field between the tip of the discharge and grounding electrodes until the numerical work conducted by Chien et al (2011). For the breakdown voltage and breakdown electric field in point-to-plane corona discharge, the breakdown voltage, V 0 (V), is expressed as (Adamiak et al 2005;Le et al 2013)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation