All Days 2016
DOI: 10.2118/179648-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and Upscaling Unstable Water and Polymer Floods: Dynamic Characterization of the Effective Finger Zone

Abstract: Upscaling of unstable immiscible flow remains an unsolved challenge for the oil industry. The absence of a reliable upscaling approach greatly hinders the effective reservoir simulation and optimization of heavy oil recoveries using waterflood, polymer flood and other chemical floods, which are inherently unstable processes. The difficulty in upscaling unstable flow lies in estimating the propagation of fingers smaller than the gridblock size. Using classical relative permeabilities obtained from stable flow a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is similar in some respects to the approach reported in Luo et al (2017) who also adjust the fractional flow to give a more appropriate curve to describe the averaged behaviour of the system in the presence of viscous fingering. Luo et al (2016) then proceeded to match this adjusted fractional flow curve to production data for unstable immiscible water flooding and also polymer flooding. They did not take the following steps to actually simulate the fingering directly, as we do in this work.…”
Section: Methods For Modelling Immiscible Viscous Fingeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is similar in some respects to the approach reported in Luo et al (2017) who also adjust the fractional flow to give a more appropriate curve to describe the averaged behaviour of the system in the presence of viscous fingering. Luo et al (2016) then proceeded to match this adjusted fractional flow curve to production data for unstable immiscible water flooding and also polymer flooding. They did not take the following steps to actually simulate the fingering directly, as we do in this work.…”
Section: Methods For Modelling Immiscible Viscous Fingeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in de Loubens et al (2018), we believe that in this specific context this simple approach can be used because the saturation domains for water and polymer injection are almost disjoint. However when water and polymer injection cover same saturation interval, as expected for lower viscosity ratio, two relative permeability sets may be defined, or alternatively a model where relative permeability is modified based on flow characteristics, as proposed in Luo et al (2016).…”
Section: Model Used To History Match Tertiary Polymer Floodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model could be calibrated using lab experiments at core scale and extended at intermediate scale using geostatistical realizations on fine grid. This approach also enabled to estimate the impact of viscous fingering on field scale production profiles (Luo et al, 2016), without hysteresis. For less viscous oil, another (Bourgeois et al, 2019).…”
Section: Secondary Polymer Flood History Matchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the treatment of reservoir‐scale heterogeneity in the streamtube method relies on a conceptual link between preferential single‐phase flow paths and two‐phase flow viscous fingers. However, reservoir rocks are strongly heterogeneous at all scales, even those smaller than the grid block size of streamtube simulations, and the effect of subgrid heterogeneity needs to be accounted for (Durlofsky et al, 2007; Efendiev & Durlofsky, 2002; Luo et al, 2016, 2018). Immiscible displacements at the scale of pores have been observed in 2‐D pore networks etched on the surface of transparent slabs (Lenormand et al, 1988; Lenormand & Zarcone, 1985; Lenormand et al, 1983; J. Yang et al, 2017) or Hele‐Shaw cells furnished with microbeads or micropillars (Ferer et al, 2004; Frette et al, 1997; Holtzman, 2016; Måløy et al, 1992; Zhao et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%