2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-017-2693-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and solving staff scheduling with partial weighted maxSAT

Abstract: Employee scheduling is a well known problem that appears in a wide range of different areas including health care, air lines, transportation services, and basically any organization that has to deal with workforces. In this paper we model a collection of challenging staff scheduling instances as a weighted partial Boolean maximum satisfiability (maxSAT) problem. Using our formulation we conduct a comparison of four different cardinality constraint encodings and analyze their applicability on this problem. Addi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing results on this dataset for comparison are shown in Table IV, including the work of [24] who model the NRP using Partial Weighted maxSAT and solve it using the WPM3 algorithm of [27] for 4 hours runtime, both an ejection chain heuristic method (reported after 10 and 60 minutes, solutions after 60 minutes shown) and a branch-and-price method implemented by [22] as in [23], and finally results for a complete integer programming implementation of the problem instances from [22], run on Gurobi 7.0 with a 1 hour runtime limit. The best results for these methods are compared with the average result of 10 runs of our ACO-IP approach in Table IV.…”
Section: Comparison Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Existing results on this dataset for comparison are shown in Table IV, including the work of [24] who model the NRP using Partial Weighted maxSAT and solve it using the WPM3 algorithm of [27] for 4 hours runtime, both an ejection chain heuristic method (reported after 10 and 60 minutes, solutions after 60 minutes shown) and a branch-and-price method implemented by [22] as in [23], and finally results for a complete integer programming implementation of the problem instances from [22], run on Gurobi 7.0 with a 1 hour runtime limit. The best results for these methods are compared with the average result of 10 runs of our ACO-IP approach in Table IV.…”
Section: Comparison Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three methods are applied to the NRP dataset in [22], the ejection chain and branch-and-price from [23], and solving the formulation provided with the integer programming software Gurobi 5.6.3. The instances of the NRP dataset have also been solved as a partially weighted maxSAT problem [24] The objective is to minimise the weighted sum of undercover, overcover, and not satisfied nurse shift preferences. This is subject to 10 requirements (with their respective category: sequence, schedule, or roster):…”
Section: Nurse Rostering Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] There is extensive literature on staffing and scheduling. [14][15][16][17][18][19] However, there is less attention in the literature regarding how managers can keep track of providers' time allotment or how a tool could assist in managing physician schedules, and equitably assigning clinical and non-clinical time as well as vacation and other time away. This is essential to help manage burnout and balance workload.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a remarkable number of algorithms for (W)PMS including complete solvers (Davies and Bacchus 2011;Ansótegui, Bonet, and Levy 2013;Narodytska and Bacchus 2014;Martins, Manquinho, and Lynce 2014;Ansótegui and Gabàs 2017) and incomplete solvers (Cai et al 2014;2016;Luo et al 2017;Lei and Cai 2018). Due to the success of these works, there has been much interest in solving combinatorial optimization problems by this kind of logical language (Demirovic and Musliu 2017;Jiang et al 2018;Demirovic, Musliu, and Winter 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%