2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2018.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and simulation of RF photoinjectors for coherent light sources

Abstract: We propose a three-dimensional fully electromagnetic numerical approach for the simulation of RF photoinjectors for coherent light sources. The basic idea consists in incorporating a selfconsistent photoemission model within a particle tracking code. The generation of electron beams in the injector is determined by the quantum efficiency (QE) of the cathode, the intensity profile of the driving laser as well as by the accelerating field and magnetic focusing conditions in the gun. The total charge emitted duri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison, we used the results obtained in the Photo Injector Test Facility at DESY, Zeuthen (PITZ) both in the computer simulation and in experiment [Krasilnikov et al, 2012;Chen et al, 2018;Krasilnikov et al, 2019;Li et al, 2019]. We simulated only first 0.6 cell of PITZ L-band normal conducting 1.6 cell RF gun with a Cs 2 Te photocathode (Fig.…”
Section: Simulation Model and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison, we used the results obtained in the Photo Injector Test Facility at DESY, Zeuthen (PITZ) both in the computer simulation and in experiment [Krasilnikov et al, 2012;Chen et al, 2018;Krasilnikov et al, 2019;Li et al, 2019]. We simulated only first 0.6 cell of PITZ L-band normal conducting 1.6 cell RF gun with a Cs 2 Te photocathode (Fig.…”
Section: Simulation Model and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly in the injector, low energy beams (i.e., ≤130 MeV at the European XFEL) are fragile and sensitive to the change of experimental conditions and machine uncertainties. Discrepancies of beam property parameters in the injector are already observed between measurement and simulation (e.g., in [3,14]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A phase change corresponds to the change of the rf field gradient applied on the cathode. This affects properties of the produced photoelectron bunch via different mechanisms (e.g., Schottkylike effect [16], space-charge effects in the cathode region [17]). To fairly compare measurement with simulation, the rf phase needs to be carefully determined with respect to the rf field zero-crossing in the experiment, and the measured phase configuration should be used in the simulation accordingly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation values are lower than measurement results by 20% to 30%. This discrepancy can be caused by laser temporal modulations [38], or simplified physics model in ASTRA simulations, such as intra beam scattering effect [17], self consistent space charge modelling close to the saturation photoemission regime [39][40][41].…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%