2018
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/294/1/012090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and simulation of cars in frontal collision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6 illustrates a notable observation: when the parameter 𝛽 is set to 0.3, the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), as described by Eq (16) pertaining to the gravitational constant, reaches its minimum value. This figure provides insight into the relationship between 𝛽 and 𝐺, demonstrating a direct proportionality between the two while ensuring that 𝛽 remains below the threshold of 1.…”
Section: Effects Of Varying Beta Parameters (β)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 6 illustrates a notable observation: when the parameter 𝛽 is set to 0.3, the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), as described by Eq (16) pertaining to the gravitational constant, reaches its minimum value. This figure provides insight into the relationship between 𝛽 and 𝐺, demonstrating a direct proportionality between the two while ensuring that 𝛽 remains below the threshold of 1.…”
Section: Effects Of Varying Beta Parameters (β)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This modeling process is based on observations of the front crumple zone of an actual vehicle system, considering the parts of the car that are affected in a front collision. This approach is expected to yield improved results as it captures the precise behavior of the vehicle collision [16].…”
Section: Modified Kamal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This equivalent model study the impact behavior of cars with a non-deformable barrier at a velocity of 50 km/h [5]. The mass and stiffness of the springs were estimated from the literature, according [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [9]. In figure 1 the notations represent: mn -the unformed mass of the passenger compartment and the rear compartment (starting from the front of the passenger compartment to the rear wheels); mbmass of the non-deformable barrier mgmp -mass of the engine-propeller unit (engine, clutch, gearbox, axle); msfs / msfd -mass of left / right front subassemblies (corresponding to front wheels and suspension and steering system); k1d/k1sthe elastic constant that make the connection between mn and msfs/msfd; k2d/k2s -the elastic constant that make the connection between mgmp and msfs/msfd; k3d/k3s -the elastic constant that make the connection between mn and mb; k4 -the elastic constant that make the connection between mgmp and mb; k5d/k5s -the elastic constant that make the connection between msfs/msfd and mb; k6 -the elastic constant that make the connection between mn and mgmp; xndisplacement of the undeformed part; xgmp -displacement of the powertrain; xsfs/xsfd -displacement of the left / right front subassemblies.…”
Section: Mathematical Model Of Mass-spring Type For the Study Of The ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial conditions impused on the system are: mn=1200 kg; mgmp=200 kg; msfs=40 kg; msfd=40 kg; k1s=200000 N/m; k1d=200000 N/m; k2s=475000 N/m; k2d=475000 N/m; k3s=140000 N/m; k3d=140000 N/m; k4=1100000 N/m; k5s=270000 N/m; k5d=270000 N/m; k6=270000 N/m; v=13,89 m/s (V= 50 km/h) [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [9].…”
Section: Mathematical Model Of Mass-spring Type For the Study Of The ...mentioning
confidence: 99%