2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and simulation of a class of liquid propellant engine pressurization systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gas-liquid two-phase flow exists in many industrial applications, including liquid fuel rocket propellant tanks [1,2]. In these tanks, the two gas and liquid phases are next to each other until the end of the engine operation [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The gas-liquid two-phase flow exists in many industrial applications, including liquid fuel rocket propellant tanks [1,2]. In these tanks, the two gas and liquid phases are next to each other until the end of the engine operation [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these tanks, the two gas and liquid phases are next to each other until the end of the engine operation [2,3]. In fact, a gas pressure feeding system is required to pressurize the fuel and oxidizer in propellant tanks to transfer them with the required flow and pressure to the combustion chamber [1,2]. The outflow of liquid propellant from the tanks is associated with forming vortices [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using Fluent 15.0 to conduct steady-state computation for the triple eccentric butterfly valve, Sun et al [18] discovered that the surface roughness may result in a big difference between the flow coefficient obtained by simulation without friction and the actual flow coefficient. The second type of research [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] focuses on the whole system rather than the valve, and thus generally uses the traditional 0D throttling flow-rate equation instead of the momentum equation to describe the dynamic throttling effect of the valve spool. In order to accurately describe the throttling effect, this simplified modeling method must take flow-rate equation, flow coefficient calculation, and valve-spool opening and closing rule into full consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liang et al [42] investigated the temperature control of a vehicle climate chamber, and the flow coefficient of adjusting valves in the chilled water system also adopted the second type of method. As for the third type of method, Karimi et al [26] used a nozzle model with variable area for the modeling of the pressure reducer valve when simulating the liquid propellant engine pressurization systems, where the flow area is function of the opening and the flow coefficient is constant; the same treating method also occurred in the modeling of the first and second throttling orifices of a class of three-way pressure reducing valve by Gad [27]. The fourth type of method usually applies to the full open valve or the constant-flow-area orifice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, several numerical models have been developed to predict the pressurization performances. Majumdar [28] , Hearn [29] , and Karimi et al [30] applied a thermodynamic equilibrium model to investigate the pressurization behaviors of a discharge process. Roudebush [31] and Masters [32] developed a onedimensional model to take into consideration the formation of thermal stratification in the ullage during discharge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%