2015
DOI: 10.1080/01496395.2015.1016531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and simulation for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture from power plant flue gas with economic analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many researchers were focusing on the MEA-based CO 2 capture in coal-fired and gas-fired power plants owing to its largest share of anthropogenic CO 2 emissions, the effect of the CO 2 capture process on the overall plant efficiency and electricity price has been studied, and efforts have been made in order to compensate the plant efficiency as well (Abu-Zahra et al, 2007a;Dave et al, 2011;Duan et al, 2012;Gupta et al, 2015). Later, the research effort was shifted to other industrial sectors, as industrial emissions were considered as another important CO 2 source.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers were focusing on the MEA-based CO 2 capture in coal-fired and gas-fired power plants owing to its largest share of anthropogenic CO 2 emissions, the effect of the CO 2 capture process on the overall plant efficiency and electricity price has been studied, and efforts have been made in order to compensate the plant efficiency as well (Abu-Zahra et al, 2007a;Dave et al, 2011;Duan et al, 2012;Gupta et al, 2015). Later, the research effort was shifted to other industrial sectors, as industrial emissions were considered as another important CO 2 source.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vaccarellia et al performed an economic evaluation of a post-combustion carbon capture process integrated in a power plant cycle. Gupta et al presented a techno-economic analysis of absorber intercooling and multipressure stripper. Similar work was done by Li et al Four process configurations (i.e., absorber intercooling, rich-amine split, modified rich-amine split, and stripper interheating) are assessed considering capital and operating costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%