2018
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201701334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and predicting chiral stationary phase enantioselectivity: An efficient random forest classifier using an optimally balanced training dataset and an aggregation strategy

Abstract: Predicting whether a chiral column will be effective is a daily task for many analysts. Moreover, finding the best chiral column for separating a particular racemic compound is mostly a matter of trial and error that may take up to a week in some cases. In this study we have developed a novel prediction approach based on combining a random forest classifier and an optimized discretization method for dealing with enantioselectivity as a continuous variable. Using the optimization results, models were trained on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, the random forest (RF) method is also used [63,77]. If an RF approach is applied, several decision trees are created.…”
Section: Multivariate Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, the random forest (RF) method is also used [63,77]. If an RF approach is applied, several decision trees are created.…”
Section: Multivariate Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has previously been shown to be useful in predicting dTm values. [ 30 ] Models were built using a previous algorithm [ 44 ] with the default parameters of generating 100 trees without limiting the number of levels, choosing 1/3 of the descriptors at each branch point, and needing at least five molecules in a node for a branch point to be created. The Gini index was used as the splitting criterion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 In a recent work, we also found that 2D-fingerprint descriptors were more powerful than 3D-descriptors to build models to find the most promising chiral selector to achieve the separation of a chiral compound. 26 It looks like meaningful 2D information is lost during the construction process of 3Ddescriptors. We thus checked if this effect could be observed between H Ã 2D S chiral ð Þ and H Ã 3D S chiral ð Þ entropy measures.…”
Section: Comparison Of 2d and 3d Structurebased Entropy Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%