2015
DOI: 10.15255/cabeq.2014.2107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and Optimization of Phosphate Recovery from Industrial Wastewater and Precipitation of Solid Fertilizer using Experimental Design Methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(24 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(i) Maximum yield of ~89% phosphate recovery can be obtained at pH 9.5, ammonium concentration of 2,000 mg L -1 , Mg/P ratio of 1.5 and a precipitation time of 40 min. Similar findings have reported that ~92.6% phosphate recovery can be obtained at pH 9.5, reaction time 34.76 min and 25.23°C temperature [40]. (ii) pH higher than 9.5 favors the formation of magnesium phosphate thereby reducing the amount of struvite formation.…”
Section: Interaction Effect Between the Process Factors And Phosphatesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…(i) Maximum yield of ~89% phosphate recovery can be obtained at pH 9.5, ammonium concentration of 2,000 mg L -1 , Mg/P ratio of 1.5 and a precipitation time of 40 min. Similar findings have reported that ~92.6% phosphate recovery can be obtained at pH 9.5, reaction time 34.76 min and 25.23°C temperature [40]. (ii) pH higher than 9.5 favors the formation of magnesium phosphate thereby reducing the amount of struvite formation.…”
Section: Interaction Effect Between the Process Factors And Phosphatesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It was noticed that the system obtained after mixing magnesium, ammonium and phosphate salts at the molar ratio 1:1:1 contains an excess of ammonium species in the solution and the precipitate that "was not struvite, but was probably composed of magnesium phosphates" [14] was obtained; it confirms the data obtained from [13]. Such inferences were formulated on the basis of X-ray diffraction (XRD) [30]- [32] of the crystallographic structure of the solid phase thus obtained. This remark is important in context with gravimetric analysis of magnesium as pyrophosphate [13].…”
Section: Dissolution Of Struvitementioning
confidence: 56%
“…The effluent was characterized for phosphorus, magnesium and ammonium concentrations. The stirring rate of 100 rpm, a reaction time of 60 min and 1h for liquid-solid phase equilibrium were set, as described in other works [ 18 , 30 ]. The dry solid precipitate with and without zeolite were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD) (Rigaku MiniFlex diffractometer, Tokyo, Japan) and scanning electron microscopy-Energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS, the SEM/Xe-PFIB Microscope FEI Helios PFIB from Massachusetts, United States) as in previous studies [ 16 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite that, several reports indicated the need for a higher NH 4 + :PO 4 3− molar ratio of substrate during P recovery by struvite precipitation. These include the reported NH 4 + :PO 4 3− mole ratio of 3.1:1 applied on swine Wastewater [ 14 ]; 5:1 on Wastewater sludge [ 15 ]; 2.69:1 on whey [ 16 ], 6:1 on municipal Wastewater [ 17 ]; and 2.25:1 from industrial Wastewater [ 18 ]. Thus, there is a reasonable expectation of ammonium residue from crystallization effluent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%