2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/965936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and Monitoring Terrestrial Primary Production in a Changing Global Environment: Toward a Multiscale Synthesis of Observation and Simulation

Abstract: There is a critical need to monitor and predict terrestrial primary production, the key indicator of ecosystem functioning, in a changing global environment. Here we provide a brief review of three major approaches to monitoring and predicting terrestrial primary production: (1) ground-based field measurements, (2) satellite-based observations, and (3) process-based ecosystem modelling. Much uncertainty exists in the multi-approach estimations of terrestrial gross primary production (GPP) and net primary produ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
54
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
4
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Lu et al, 2005), the difference between which may lead to the significant difference in the estimated NPP. It is necessary to estimate NPP with more accurate data and evaluate the ecosystem models against ground and satellite-based measurements and observations in order to improve the capacity of model simulation and prediction (Pan et al, 2014). The data accuracy of the explanatory variables may also influence the estimation results.…”
Section: Uncertainties and Management Implicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Lu et al, 2005), the difference between which may lead to the significant difference in the estimated NPP. It is necessary to estimate NPP with more accurate data and evaluate the ecosystem models against ground and satellite-based measurements and observations in order to improve the capacity of model simulation and prediction (Pan et al, 2014). The data accuracy of the explanatory variables may also influence the estimation results.…”
Section: Uncertainties and Management Implicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, understanding NEE responses to environmental change, to ecosystem management and to site characteristics is essential for predicting future biogeochemical cycles (Law et al 2002;Pan et al 2014;Li et al 2016). To this end, processbased vegetation models (PVMs) of varying complexity are being used, operating at varying scales (Keenan et al 2012;Fischer et al 2014;Reyer 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terrestrial NPP is also an essential component of the global carbon cycle (Melillo et al, 1993) that links terrestrial biota with the atmosphere (Beer et al, 2010). Monitoring and modeling GPP and NPP at regional and global scales have attracted much attention (Pan et al, 2014b;Running et al, 2004;Tian et al, 1998) because they not only measure the transfer of energy to the biosphere and terrestrial CO 2 assimilation, but also because they provide the basis for assessing the status of a wide range of ecological processes (Piacentini and Rosina, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigating factors controlling changes in terrestrial primary production could provide important clues to the underlying mechanisms and advance our understanding of the complex interactions among terrestrial ecosystems, atmosphere, and climate system (Tian et al, 2000). During the past decades, GPP and NPP estimation and investigation of their influencing factors, especially at large scales, have drawn much attention among the scientific community, policy-making agencies, and the public due to global climate change and increases in the atmospheric CO 2 concentration (Zscheischler et al, 2014;Pan et al, 2014b;Sitch et al, 2008). Since the global GPP is roughly 120 Pg C yr -1 and is the largest flux of the global carbon cycle (Beer et al, 2010), even small fluctuations in GPP and NPP (usually estimated as half of GPP) could cause large changes in the airborne fraction of anthropogenic CO 2 (Raupach et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation