2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-018-2468-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and experimental validation for surface error caused by axial cutting force in end-milling process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following assumptions are made to simplify the calculation of defined the thin-walled blade workpiece [17]:…”
Section: Non-uniform Allowances Based On Machining Error Prediction M...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following assumptions are made to simplify the calculation of defined the thin-walled blade workpiece [17]:…”
Section: Non-uniform Allowances Based On Machining Error Prediction M...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, high speed combined with low rigidity makes easier the appearance of chatter. These vibrations can arise due to the system excitation at the natural frequency response of the cutting-tool or the workpiece or due to the amplification of the displacements caused by the forces and the lack of stiffness [31,32]. In these cases, the cut is unstable creating an un-constant chip thickness, which is afterwards reflected on the surface quality [33,34].…”
Section: Milling Of Aerospace Aluminum Alloysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These instabilities are usually related to the tool vibrations produced during the machining but the most important one is the FRF of the part [17,25,27], which is constantly changing due to geometry variations. This cyclical behavior changes the FRF of the system and generates an unstable machining process [11,28]. Forced vibration or amplification takes place when the stiffness of the part is not enough to maintain a constant chip thickness.…”
Section: Type Of Parts and Associated Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others authors considered the tool position [49,70] and the fixture system [5]. Zhang et al [28] went further by including the effect of the distance to the clamping system.…”
Section: Computational Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%