2013
DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2013.823442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and Experimental Studies of Adsorptive Dewatering of Selected Aliphatic Alcohols in Temperature Swing Adsorption System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diffusion coefficient changed from 7.77 Â 10 À9 m 2 =s for the original sludge to 7.01 Â 10 À9 m 2 =s for the mixed sludge and then increased to 8.35 Â 10 À9 m 2 =s for the mixture of a mass ratio of 4=6. These results are within the normally expected range of D eff (10 À11 to 10 À9 m 2 =s) [43] and they are similar to those results obtained in the case of sludge by Bennamoun et al [5] and Reyes et al, [8] for mushrooms by Xanthopoulos et al, [44] for potatoes by Ruiz-Ló pez et al, [45] and for beads by Ambrożek et al [46] As can be seen, the comparison presented in Table 6 confirmed that neglecting the shrinkage effect can produce erroneous results. This is reflected in two aspects: first, because the diffusion coefficient calculated without consideration of shrinkage was bigger than the value obtained when shrinkage was considered.…”
Section: Determination Of the Diffusion Coefficient Throughsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The diffusion coefficient changed from 7.77 Â 10 À9 m 2 =s for the original sludge to 7.01 Â 10 À9 m 2 =s for the mixed sludge and then increased to 8.35 Â 10 À9 m 2 =s for the mixture of a mass ratio of 4=6. These results are within the normally expected range of D eff (10 À11 to 10 À9 m 2 =s) [43] and they are similar to those results obtained in the case of sludge by Bennamoun et al [5] and Reyes et al, [8] for mushrooms by Xanthopoulos et al, [44] for potatoes by Ruiz-Ló pez et al, [45] and for beads by Ambrożek et al [46] As can be seen, the comparison presented in Table 6 confirmed that neglecting the shrinkage effect can produce erroneous results. This is reflected in two aspects: first, because the diffusion coefficient calculated without consideration of shrinkage was bigger than the value obtained when shrinkage was considered.…”
Section: Determination Of the Diffusion Coefficient Throughsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Although adsorption is an exothermic process, a common assumption when modeling adsorptive processes in the liquid phase is to disregard the energy balance and assume an isothermal process due to the generally high heat capacities of liquids. , In order to verify the validity of this assumption for the case considered here, the maximum possible temperature increase, i.e., the temperature increase under adiabatic conditions, was calculated for experiment C2. The calculation method is described in detail in the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Modeling Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The practice of adsorptive drying for liquid solvents is widespread in industry; however, the available scientific literature on this subject remains remarkably limited. Some studies have focused on drying nonpolar solvents such as toluene, benzene, or xylene using different adsorbents like zeolite 3A, zeolite 4A, and activated alumina. , Other studies have delved into the drying of alcohols on several adsorbents including zeolite 3A and 4A. All of these investigations have primarily examined the equilibrium or kinetics of water adsorption while mostly disregarding the coadsorption of other components. Santos et al investigated the equilibrium and kinetics of the adsorptive drying of dimethyl carbonate on zeolite 3A under high-pressure conditions, revealing significant coadsorption of dimethyl carbonate within the adsorbent pores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve energy savings, the researchers proposed some suggestions for improving the design conditions without causing a significant impact on the purification performance. Ambro żek et al [17] conducted an analysis of adsorption drying for specific water-aliphatic alcohol solutions using mathematical modeling and experimental techniques. The developed isothermal model in this study incorporated various factors, such as liquid film mass transport, diffusion coefficients, variable axial diffusion, and experimentally derived Langmuir-Freundlich isotherms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%