2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and experimental studies of in-duct mercury capture by activated carbon injection in an entrained flow reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though the mathematical formulation is a brief summary and simplifies some elements, this model can roughly predict the performance of sorbents. Besides, Duan et al have analyzed the influences of model parameters and verified that the mathematical model is suitable for mercury removal speculation. In general, the mathematical model helps to prejudge the applicability of adsorbents for real flue gas mercury capture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the mathematical formulation is a brief summary and simplifies some elements, this model can roughly predict the performance of sorbents. Besides, Duan et al have analyzed the influences of model parameters and verified that the mathematical model is suitable for mercury removal speculation. In general, the mathematical model helps to prejudge the applicability of adsorbents for real flue gas mercury capture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model assumes that the activated lignite particles have a uniform pore structure and that the effective gas-phase diffusion coefficient is constant. The latter one is calculated from the values of the mercury diffusion coefficient in air, reported in the literature, and the Knudson diffusion coefficient (Skodras et al, 2008;Zhou et al, 2015). For its part, the boundary layer mass transfer coefficient was determined using the Sherwood number correlation (Skodras et al, 2008).…”
Section: Mercury Adsorption Modeling On Activated Lignitementioning
confidence: 99%
“… 4 6 It is well-known that Hg p and Hg 2+ can be easily controlled by dust removal devices and wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD), respectively. 7 , 8 Nevertheless, Hg 0 is difficult to remove because it is insoluble and volatile at normal temperature and pressure. 9 , 10 Consequently, development of systems that ensure the removal of Hg 0 is imperative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%