2016
DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2016.2521585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and Comparison of In-Field Critical Current Density Anisotropy in High-Temperature Superconducting (HTS) Coated Conductors

Abstract: J. (2016) 'Modelling and comparison of in-eld critical current density anisotropy in high temperature superconducting (HTS) coated conductors.', IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity., 26 (3). 6600906 .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Classically, in LTS applications, the electric field criterion is given as E 0 = 10 µV/m, which is the value also used in this paper. It must be noted, however, that in some other publications [41,42], reporting HTS experiments, a criterion of 100 µV/m is used. To determine the critical current the electric field in the coil is plotted against the current in a so-called EI-curve, which is defined here as the averaged electric field against the current in the coil, as opposed to en EJ-relation that describes the local behavior.…”
Section: Sc Transition and Critical Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classically, in LTS applications, the electric field criterion is given as E 0 = 10 µV/m, which is the value also used in this paper. It must be noted, however, that in some other publications [41,42], reporting HTS experiments, a criterion of 100 µV/m is used. To determine the critical current the electric field in the coil is plotted against the current in a so-called EI-curve, which is defined here as the averaged electric field against the current in the coil, as opposed to en EJ-relation that describes the local behavior.…”
Section: Sc Transition and Critical Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both critical current and AC loss simulations, we used J c (B, θ) values deduced from the measured I c (B, θ) shown in figure 2, by generating a three column look-up table [B radial , B axial , J c (B radial , B axial )], where B radial and B axial are the radial and axial components of the magnetic field, and using the direct interpolation method [32]. If the field angle is α, B radial =Bcos(α)=B r and B axial =Bsin(α)=B z as shown in figure 1. The B radial and B axial components of the other field angles shown in figure 7 can be calculated in a similar way, resulting in the set of components shown in table 1 for the four different assemblies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 A test circular, epoxy-impregnated HTS coil used for DC characterisation measured J c (B, θ) simply and directly as input data for the model. This type of direct interpolation can significantly improve the computational speed and convergence of the model, even when the real tape thickness is modelled, and avoids complicated data fitting while improving accuracy [22]. Another example of how to extract a J c (B, θ) relationship from experimental data can be found in [23].…”
Section: Modelling Framework For Hts Coilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the numerical simulation, the 2D axisymmetric model above is used, and the J c (B, θ) dependence of a short sample taken from the same spool of tape provided in [22] (sample SP1 in this reference) is input using the direct interpolation described above. The inner radius of the coil is 60 mm, and the distance between each superconducting layer is 190 µm.…”
Section: Assessing Coil Performancementioning
confidence: 99%