Solution-processed and low-temperature evaporated OLEDs are amenable to highvolume production methods that are compatible with thin, conformal, and flexible substrates, such as roll-to-roll processing or printing. [4] As issues related to scaling pixel sizes are addressed, [5] OLEDs could become a technology choice for diffuse, low luminance, large area lighting panels that are thin and lightweight. [6] As increasingly efficient OLED materials are developed and their production is scaled using methods with low embodied energy, OLED lighting panels may help to reduce worldwide energy consumption for lighting using sustainable materials. [7] Despite the great success of OLEDs in the display technology market, for lighting applications OLEDs have not to date been widely adopted. Several factors have played a role in this regard, a central one being the requirement for relatively high electrical drive currents in large area OLEDs limited by the relatively high sheet resistance (≈10-20 Ω □ −1) of the transparent conductive electrodes (TCEs). Additionally, for large-area printed OLEDs intended for lighting applications, standard "lab-scale" deposition methods such as spin-coating are not appropriate, and one must turn instead to printing methodologies. Furthermore, since point defect densities scale exponentially with area in thin solution-processed layers (typically efficient OLEDs have emissive layer thicknesses of ≈100 nm), high production yields over large areas naturally require much thicker devices with non-optimal performance characteristics. [8] Minimizing defects also requires a low surface roughness (indeed flat) deposition substrate, and this is where the quality of the TCE also plays a role since in a conventional architecture it is the support electrode. The required electrical and optical properties of TCEs impose additional constraints on the choice of available materials. In practical terms average visible transmittances >80% (with flat spectral responses) and resistivities <10 −3 Ω • cm are required. [7,9,10] For state-of-the-art metal oxide TCEs such as indium tin oxide (ITO) this means a sheet resistance of order 10-20 Ω □ −1-very much on the borderline of Transparent conducting electrodes (TCEs) are key components of optoelectronic devices where input or output light coupling are central functions-for example, solar cells, light-emitting diodes, or displays. Indium tin oxide (ITO) has been the TCE of choice for over three decades, and there are few alternatives. The characteristic size of devices made with ITO is often limited to a few centimeters because of the intrinsic sheet resistance. This is an obstacle for scaling thin film photovoltaics and lighting platforms to technologicallyrelevant large areas. In this article, the use of metallic micro-grids is investigated to improve sheet resistance-visible transparency balance of TCEs, resulting in improved performance and stability of organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs). Finite element models are used to simulate OLEDs pixels on ITO with metal gri...