2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.06.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and analysis of sampling artifacts in measurements of gas-particle partitioning of semivolatile organic contaminants using filter-sorbent samplers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, at a flow rate of 0.50 L/ min per wire mesh tube, the DEHP gas penetration rate was approximately 7.4% (93% DEHP gas removal efficiency). As the removal efficiency of the same DT in the previous study 37 was approximately 90%, the DT used in this study exhibited a suitable removal performance because the measured removal efficiencies were equal to the theoretical DT penetration rate determined by the Gormley and Kennedy equation 38 shown in Figure 6 (DEHP gas diffusion coefficient was equal to that of one 10 nm particle; D = 4.0 9 10 À6 m 2 /s). 39 Figure 6 also shows the theoretical diffusion coefficients for 10 and 100 nm particles for comparison.…”
Section: Examination Of the Separation Sampling Methods Of Svoc Gas Anmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…However, at a flow rate of 0.50 L/ min per wire mesh tube, the DEHP gas penetration rate was approximately 7.4% (93% DEHP gas removal efficiency). As the removal efficiency of the same DT in the previous study 37 was approximately 90%, the DT used in this study exhibited a suitable removal performance because the measured removal efficiencies were equal to the theoretical DT penetration rate determined by the Gormley and Kennedy equation 38 shown in Figure 6 (DEHP gas diffusion coefficient was equal to that of one 10 nm particle; D = 4.0 9 10 À6 m 2 /s). 39 Figure 6 also shows the theoretical diffusion coefficients for 10 and 100 nm particles for comparison.…”
Section: Examination Of the Separation Sampling Methods Of Svoc Gas Anmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…This assumption is appropriate since our methodology incorporated rinsing of WBs to remove particles prior analysis as well as collecting and analyzing two distinct matrices (filter and XAD) from the active sampler. Artifacts in active air sampling have been reported as potential concerns [ 37 39 ]. For example, gas-phase PAH absorbed on the filter or breakthrough of particle-bound PAH from the filter to the XAD could lead to miss-quantification of the gas/particle distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limited studies have been conducted on investigating the gas-particle partitioning of VOCs in the atmosphere. Samples collected in the field showed large variabilities of K ip due to both thermodynamic and non-thermodynamic reasons such as the dynamic temperature, sampling artifacts (e.g., which sampling system to use), non-equilibrium conditions [3 , 4 , [17] , [18] , [19] . Opposite correlations between K ip and the VOCs’ properties were also obtained [4 , 5] .…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%