2016
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1522656113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and analysis of collective cell migration in an in vivo three-dimensional environment

Abstract: A long-standing question in collective cell migration has been what might be the relative advantage of forming a cluster over migrating individually. Does an increase in the size of a collectively migrating group of cells enable them to sample the chemical gradient over a greater distance because the difference between front and rear of a cluster would be greater than for single cells? We combined theoretical modeling with experiments to study collective migration of the border cells in-between nurse cells in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
72
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
6
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these elements have been integrated into single-cell models including modeling of the flow of the actin cytoskeleton [29, 211, 226, 227] or application of minimal active fluid models [228], but the impact on collective migration is not yet clear. However, given the clear role of cytosolic hydrodynamics in development [229] and the recent suggestion that some collective cell motility may be limited by hydrodynamic flow in the surrounding tissue [230], extension of models to greater mechanical detail would be highly relevant. An initial step in this direction was recently published by Marth and Voigt, who used collective phase field models to extend a minimal active fluid cell model to handle multiple hydrodynamically-interacting cells [131].…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these elements have been integrated into single-cell models including modeling of the flow of the actin cytoskeleton [29, 211, 226, 227] or application of minimal active fluid models [228], but the impact on collective migration is not yet clear. However, given the clear role of cytosolic hydrodynamics in development [229] and the recent suggestion that some collective cell motility may be limited by hydrodynamic flow in the surrounding tissue [230], extension of models to greater mechanical detail would be highly relevant. An initial step in this direction was recently published by Marth and Voigt, who used collective phase field models to extend a minimal active fluid cell model to handle multiple hydrodynamically-interacting cells [131].…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collective migration of cells occurs during the normal developmental processes [1][2][3][4], physiological responses during wound healing or in an immune response [5,6]. It also plays an important role during pathologies such as cancer metastasis [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S5). This suggests that friction forces scale much faster than linearly with particle size, as has been observed in Drosophila embryos 22 , and in contrast to the behavior expected in the low-Reynolds Stokes regime.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%