2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-4257(03)00098-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling airborne laser scanning data for the spatial generation of critical forest parameters in fire behavior modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
166
0
7

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
166
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Derivation of the apparent foliage profile from LiDAR observations has been well described (Lovell et al 2003, Riano et al 2003. The probability of a gap from the top of the canopy to a given height, z, can be estimated by summing the total number of hits down to z and comparing them to the total number of independent LiDAR shot (N):…”
Section: Lidar Based Measures Of Canopy Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Derivation of the apparent foliage profile from LiDAR observations has been well described (Lovell et al 2003, Riano et al 2003. The probability of a gap from the top of the canopy to a given height, z, can be estimated by summing the total number of hits down to z and comparing them to the total number of independent LiDAR shot (N):…”
Section: Lidar Based Measures Of Canopy Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, we modify the Lefsky et al (1999) computations of canopy volume profile to allow their prediction from discrete (first and last return) LiDAR data. To enable this, each of the 20m x 20m plots were subset into sixteen 5m x 5m windows and all LiDAR non-ground returns binned within of these 25 m² (5 x 5) plot subsets The number of returns within each of the sub-plots at 1 m height intervals were then counted and corrected according to Lefsky et al (1998) and Riano et al (2003). A sub plot size of 25m² is a compromise between obtaining a sufficient number of ground returns required for the correction of small footprint LiDAR returns, and having enough subplots within the area to characterize the stand.…”
Section: Lidar Canopy Volume Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, interpretation of aerial photography coupled with field data has been the primary method used to map fire-related tree crown variables (Riano et al, 2003) such as crown bulk density, crown closure, and canopy height. More recently empirical methods, which are less labor intensive, have been used to estimate these variables from Landsat thematic mapper (TM) and systeme probatoire d'observation de la terre (SPOT) high resolution visible (HRV) data (Riano et al, 2003).…”
Section: Remote Sensing Of Crown Fuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently empirical methods, which are less labor intensive, have been used to estimate these variables from Landsat thematic mapper (TM) and systeme probatoire d'observation de la terre (SPOT) high resolution visible (HRV) data (Riano et al, 2003). For example, Franklin et al (2003) mapped various stand attributes, including canopy height and crown closure, through implementation of empirical relationships between single band Landsat reflectance and canopy characteristics.…”
Section: Remote Sensing Of Crown Fuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation