2018
DOI: 10.1177/0143624417749536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling air leakage in buildings caused by the cyclic variation of the atmospheric pressure

Abstract: This article considers a new type of air infiltration through building envelopes caused by the barometric pressure variation. This process is independent from wind action or stack effect. A new building-atmosphere differential equation of air exchange is established. Based on the solution of the differential equation of air exchange, we propose the notion of pressure equilibration time 50 that characterizes the dynamic response of the building. Furthermore, experimental climatic data were processed using Fouri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(123 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, it does not have the capacity of leak detection. The impact on airtightness of stack effect, wind, barometric pressure, or other conditions has been investigated (Kraniotis et al, 2014;Patrascu et al, 2018;M. H. Sherman, 1987M.…”
Section: Airtightness In Buildingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, it does not have the capacity of leak detection. The impact on airtightness of stack effect, wind, barometric pressure, or other conditions has been investigated (Kraniotis et al, 2014;Patrascu et al, 2018;M. H. Sherman, 1987M.…”
Section: Airtightness In Buildingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the advances in the airtightness knowledge, its importance has progressed distinctively among countries, mostly due to their different climatic contexts, cultural influences and levels of development (Patrascu et al, 2018). It is common that countries of subtropical or tropical climates, such as Mexico and Brazil, overlook the concept and do not measure airtightness levels neither evaluate their impact on thermal comfort in buildings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The K-P "divide-by-20" method has drawn particular attention for being an inaccurate estimator (Keig et al, 2016;Johnston and Stafford, 2017;Vega Pasos et al 2019 and so is deemed appropriate only for low precision estimations of air infiltration (Ramos et al, 2015) during the heating season (Jones et al, 2016). Despite this, it is claimed that the K-P is the most used method (Patrascu et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2019, 2020) and so is deemed appropriate only for low precision estimations of air infiltration (Ramos et al , 2015) during the heating season (Jones et al , 2016). Despite this, it is claimed that the K–P is the most used method (Patrascu et al , 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%