2012
DOI: 10.1121/1.4755039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling acousto-optic sensing of high-intensity focused ultrasound lesion formation

Abstract: Real-time acousto-optic (AO) sensing has been shown to non-invasively detect changes in tissue optical properties, a direct indicator of thermal damage, during high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy. In this work, a comprehensive model is developed to describe the AO sensing of lesion formation during HIFU therapy. The angular spectrum method is used to model ultrasound propagation, and the temperature field due to the absorption of ultrasound is modeled using a finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Acoustooptic techniques, on the other hand, are sensitive to changes in both absorption and scattering and the changes in scattering were relatively insensitive to optical wavelength. Previous analysis of penetration depth for an acoustooptic system (Adams 2015) suggests that the depth at which AO can detect HIFU lesions is dependent on sensor geometry, wavelength, lesion volume, and tissue type. For example, in breast detection to 50 mm is feasible, for prostate up to 25 mm, but for liver detection is likely not possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acoustooptic techniques, on the other hand, are sensitive to changes in both absorption and scattering and the changes in scattering were relatively insensitive to optical wavelength. Previous analysis of penetration depth for an acoustooptic system (Adams 2015) suggests that the depth at which AO can detect HIFU lesions is dependent on sensor geometry, wavelength, lesion volume, and tissue type. For example, in breast detection to 50 mm is feasible, for prostate up to 25 mm, but for liver detection is likely not possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%