2018
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaabc1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling a Single SEP Event from Multiple Vantage Points Using the iPATH Model

Abstract: Using the recently extended 2D improved Particle Acceleration and Transport in the Heliosphere (iPATH) model, we model an example gradual solar energetic particle event as observed at multiple locations. Protons and ions that are energized via the diffusive shock acceleration mechanism are followed at a 2D coronal mass ejection-driven shock where the shock geometry varies across the shock front. The subsequent transport of energetic particles, including cross-field diffusion, is modeled by a Monte Carlo code t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We would speculate that a fast shock Ng and Reames ( 2008) solved the self-consistent time-dependent wave-particle interaction while Zank et al (2000) used a series of instantaneous steady-state solutions in their PATH (Particle Acceleration and Transport in the Heliosphere) model. The latter simplicity gave a better determination of maximum particle energies of GeV and allowed the inclusion of more-realistic two-dimensional versions of the CME and shock in the PATH models, including oblique shocks (Li et al 2012) and perpendicular diffusion of the particles caused by random walk of the magnetic fields (Hu et al , 2018.…”
Section: Models and Shock Accelerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We would speculate that a fast shock Ng and Reames ( 2008) solved the self-consistent time-dependent wave-particle interaction while Zank et al (2000) used a series of instantaneous steady-state solutions in their PATH (Particle Acceleration and Transport in the Heliosphere) model. The latter simplicity gave a better determination of maximum particle energies of GeV and allowed the inclusion of more-realistic two-dimensional versions of the CME and shock in the PATH models, including oblique shocks (Li et al 2012) and perpendicular diffusion of the particles caused by random walk of the magnetic fields (Hu et al , 2018.…”
Section: Models and Shock Accelerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ng and Reames (2008) solved the self-consistent time-dependent wave-particle interaction while Zank et al (2000) used a series of instantaneous steady-state solutions in their PATH (Particle Acceleration and Transport in the Heliosphere) model. The latter simplicity gave a better determination of maximum particle energies of GeV and allowed the inclusion of more-realistic two-dimensional versions of the CME and shock in the PATH models, including oblique shocks (Li et al 2012) and perpendicular diffusion of the particles caused by random walk of the magnetic fields (Hu et al 2017(Hu et al , 2018.…”
Section: Models and Shock Accelerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the strongest acceleration is assumed to occur near the central region of the shock, where the shock is presumably strongest and the speed is likely to be highest, and tends to decline around on the flanks (see, e.g., Reames 1999). It is worth noting that the strongest acceleration typically reflects the geometry of the shock and magnetic field, which can also make the flanks important for accelerating particles (see, e.g., Tylka et al 2005;Zank et al 2006;Hu et al 2017Hu et al , 2018. As can be seen from panel (c) of Figure 5, there is a clear anisotropy of energetic particles, indicating that the energetic particles of this event are propagating predominantly outward from the Sun, which gives additional evidence that the energetic particles are likely accelerated remotely.…”
Section: Flankmentioning
confidence: 99%