2021
DOI: 10.3390/app11167307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling a Pre-Touch Reaction Distance around Socially Touchable Upper Body Parts of a Robot

Abstract: Although before-touch situations are essential to achieve natural touch interactions between people and robots, they receive less attention than after-touch situations. This study reports pre-touch reaction distance analysis results around touchable upper body parts, i.e., shoulders, elbows, and hands, based on human–human pre-touch interaction. We also analyzed the effects of gender, approach side, speed, and acclimation in modeling the pre-touch reaction distance, and found that the distance around the hands… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some studies identified a difference in how the same and different genders manage personal space ( Heshka and Nelson, 1972 ) and how they interact with human-looking agents as a before-touch reaction around the face ( Shiomi et al, 2018 ), other studies concluded that gender made no difference in such preferences. For example, when analyzing the minimum comfortable distance for socially-touchable body parts in human interaction for implementation in a humanoid robot, gender did not affect the obtained values ( Cuello Mejía et al, 2021 ). Also, in a virtual reality environment, this minimum distance around the face was not strongly affected by the gender of the avatar or the participant ( Mejía et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Results and Discussion For Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Although some studies identified a difference in how the same and different genders manage personal space ( Heshka and Nelson, 1972 ) and how they interact with human-looking agents as a before-touch reaction around the face ( Shiomi et al, 2018 ), other studies concluded that gender made no difference in such preferences. For example, when analyzing the minimum comfortable distance for socially-touchable body parts in human interaction for implementation in a humanoid robot, gender did not affect the obtained values ( Cuello Mejía et al, 2021 ). Also, in a virtual reality environment, this minimum distance around the face was not strongly affected by the gender of the avatar or the participant ( Mejía et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Results and Discussion For Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the avatar reaction, we implemented a face-looking reaction behavior at a certain distance from the participant’s hand, based on the previous work ( Cuello Mejía et al, 2021 ). In a previous study, pre-touch reaction distances were obtained for socially-touchable upper body parts: shoulders (24.8 cm), elbows (24.1 cm), and hands (21.5 cm) based on human interactions.…”
Section: Materials and Methods For Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations