2006
DOI: 10.1063/1.2263475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling a Material’s Instantaneous Velocity during Acceleration Driven by a Detonation’s Gas-Push

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ratio of v i to V i is between 4 and 13; therefore, the energy obtained by the prefabricated fragment in the "detonation products acceleration stage" and the energy obtained by the prefabricated fragment in the "metal-medium interaction stage" is between 15 and 168, which indicates that the "detonation product acceleration stage" is the main stage at which the initial velocity of the prefabricated fragments is obtained. This shows that the acceleration ability of the detonation products to the prefabricated fragments is much greater than that of the detonation wave and the shock wave [26].…”
Section: Simulation Results Of the Three-stage Detonation Drive Modelmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The ratio of v i to V i is between 4 and 13; therefore, the energy obtained by the prefabricated fragment in the "detonation products acceleration stage" and the energy obtained by the prefabricated fragment in the "metal-medium interaction stage" is between 15 and 168, which indicates that the "detonation product acceleration stage" is the main stage at which the initial velocity of the prefabricated fragments is obtained. This shows that the acceleration ability of the detonation products to the prefabricated fragments is much greater than that of the detonation wave and the shock wave [26].…”
Section: Simulation Results Of the Three-stage Detonation Drive Modelmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The spherical surface approach has been shown to be more accurate for smaller charge to mass ratios without any loss of agreement at larger charge to mass ratios. It should be recognized that this analytic modeling approach neglects initial acceleration due to shock processes [7] and is therefore anticipated to be more accurate as the initial shock process damps out. The model as expressed does not consider the fact that the cylinders thin during radial expansion.…”
Section: Analytic Cylinder Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%