2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07512-9_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling a Landing Gear System in Event-B

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The last Event-B machine is quite large (2 694 LOC), which denotes that the case study was an interesting modeling and verification challenge. The Rodin provers were less efficient than in previous ABZ case studies, where the manual proofs ratio was closer to 30% [8,9].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…The last Event-B machine is quite large (2 694 LOC), which denotes that the case study was an interesting modeling and verification challenge. The Rodin provers were less efficient than in previous ABZ case studies, where the manual proofs ratio was closer to 30% [8,9].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…• Formal modeling methods including the Event-B methods [34,35,36,37,42], abstract state machines (ASM) [38,43], and the Fiacre formal language [39,40]; • Verification techniques including a proof theory [34,35,37,43] and model checking [35,39,41,40,43]; and • A test case generation technique [41], a run-time monitoring approach [40,41], and a simulation technique [44]. These proposals provide only a partial solution with a unique objective, either modeling, verification, or testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, we think that more information should be provided on the internal variables like setV ehicleSpeed that represents the automatic acceleration of the system in order to able to build a more complete system. Finally through the different case studies proposed in the ABZ conference [8,9], we are now convinced of the need to improve the Event-B language to make it supports the real numbers as basic types. Its prover should be also extended to include more rules on arithmetic and set theories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%