2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.09.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeled temperature dependencies of macromolecular allocation and elemental stoichiometry in phytoplankton

Abstract: Graphical abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(91 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite such a simplification, our model may well capture the elemental stoichiometry across taxa ( Inomura et al., 2020 ), which may suggest that the factors that we simplified have only secondary effects. We note that despite these simplifications, our model resolves more detailed macromolecular allocations than widely used models (e.g., Droop types), and thus these simplifications are done at more detailed levels ( Armin and Inomura, 2021 ; Inomura et al., 2020 ) than widely used models, including Monod kinetics ( Monod, 1949 ). Further experiments must be performed for the incorporation of further details.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Despite such a simplification, our model may well capture the elemental stoichiometry across taxa ( Inomura et al., 2020 ), which may suggest that the factors that we simplified have only secondary effects. We note that despite these simplifications, our model resolves more detailed macromolecular allocations than widely used models (e.g., Droop types), and thus these simplifications are done at more detailed levels ( Armin and Inomura, 2021 ; Inomura et al., 2020 ) than widely used models, including Monod kinetics ( Monod, 1949 ). Further experiments must be performed for the incorporation of further details.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mechanistic model (i.e., Cell Flux Model of Phytoplankton, CFM-Phyto) was recently developed which outputs the relationship between growth rate, elemental stoichiometry, and macromolecular allocations (e.g., proteins, DNA, RNA, carbohydrates, and chlorophyll) in phytoplankton given different environmental conditions. Initial environmental parameters which can be used include varying nutrient regimes, temperature, and light intensity ( Armin and Inomura, 2021 ; Inomura et al., 2020 ). CFM-Phyto has been shown to well capture the observed trends of elemental stoichiometry of various phytoplankton ( Chalup and Laws, 1990 ; Healey, 1985 ; Inomura et al., 2020 ; Sakshaug and Andersen, 1989 ), supporting its structural robustness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The linear relationship of synthetic protein to the growth rate is consistent with prior observations of linearly increasing investment to ribosomal proteins and protein-based N with growth rate ( Rhee, 1978 ; Jahn et al., 2018 ; Zavřel et al., 2019 ). We set the value for to be 0.1 mol N mol C −1 d, which is in a reasonable range consistent with previous studies ( Inomura et al., 2020 ; Armin and Inomura, 2021 ). N storage only occurs when N is in excess, therefore the N-limited simulation does not include N storage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%