2014
DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2014.962668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model Updating to Forecast the Dynamic Behavior of the Ghirlandina Tower in Modena, Italy

Abstract: Historical masonry towers survive at an alarming angle of inclination and may be in danger of leaning instability due to the lack of stiffness of the supporting soil. Therefore, careful investigation is required to estimate the seismic vulnerability as well as its long-term behavior. These problems require a multidisciplinary approach to properly model the behavior of the structure and its interaction with the supporting soil. This article is intended to contribute to these aspects, by showing how identificati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the tower is responding and adapting to the behavior of the soil, which was strongly consolidated during the big earthquake that occurred in Modena in May 2012. The earthquake, indeed, was characterized by a main vertical component , and the soil has gradually released the compression, accumulated in the form of interstitial pressure . As a consequence, the tower has suffered with a certain time latency the permanent residual component of vertical displacement, which was highlighted only by this analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, the tower is responding and adapting to the behavior of the soil, which was strongly consolidated during the big earthquake that occurred in Modena in May 2012. The earthquake, indeed, was characterized by a main vertical component , and the soil has gradually released the compression, accumulated in the form of interstitial pressure . As a consequence, the tower has suffered with a certain time latency the permanent residual component of vertical displacement, which was highlighted only by this analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…As a consequence, there was no way with the existing sensors to determine whether the tower experienced a permanent deformation or not until the present methodology put the residual vertical failure suffered by the structure into evidence. After the confirmation given by the following survey campaigns, where no raising was detected, the municipality, in accordance with the Scientific Committee, installed a number of accelerometers for a dynamic monitoring . In some way, it can be noticed that the proposed methodology highlighted the potential need of a dynamic monitoring system and supported the decisional process to implement it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The results obtained showed the interaction with the cathedral and the important contribution of the soil-structure interaction on the tower's modes of vibration. [28][29][30][31] During the same year, a sensor network made of 12 capacitive accelerometers and 3 thermocouples was permanently installed on the tower, in order to implement a monitoring system acquiring data continuously over a long period of time. The sensors were put at different heights, from the basement up to the cusp (Figure 2).…”
Section: The Long-term Monitoring Of the Ghirlandina Towermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being non-destructive, such techniques perfectly meet the well-known minimum intervention and reversibility criteria for CH assets [5]. Through dynamic identification, vibrational properties of the structure (natural frequencies, modal shapes and damping coefficients) can be deduced and compared to the ones obtained from numerical models [6,7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%