2016
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/744/1/012073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model updating in flexible-link multibody systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e results provided by the updated model are also compared with those obtained through the original nominal model (which is the one synthesized through nominal parameters of links, like the one in [22]). In (31) and (32), ω i and η i are the ith eigenfrequency and eigenvector estimated through the models (i � 1, .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…e results provided by the updated model are also compared with those obtained through the original nominal model (which is the one synthesized through nominal parameters of links, like the one in [22]). In (31) and (32), ω i and η i are the ith eigenfrequency and eigenvector estimated through the models (i � 1, .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where η i denotes the transformed experimental eigenvector to be employed in the model updating procedure. e result proposed in (8) is the exact relation that transforms the measured expanded eigenvectors and is an improvement of the approximated one proposed in [22].…”
Section: Mode Shape Transformation From the Physical Referencementioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The modulus plot highlights the presence of the fundamental mode at about 13 Hz, and the phase plot corroborates this fact, showing large phase changes at the same frequency. The tests were carried out with the modal analysis approach [20], which is widely used in the fields of automotive engineering [21,22], aerospace engineering [23], automatic machines [24], and robotics [25]. A grid of measurement points was defined on the robot (see Figure 5); points 10 and 11 were used to monitor base vibrations.…”
Section: Testing Equipment and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%