2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.01006.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model Uncertainty and Option Markets with Heterogeneous Beliefs

Abstract: This paper provides option pricing and volume implications for an economy with heterogeneous agents who face model uncertainty and have different beliefs on expected returns. Market incompleteness makes options nonredundant, while heterogeneity creates a link between differences in beliefs and option volumes. We solve for both option prices and volumes and test the joint empirical implications using S&P500 index option data. Specifically, we use survey data to build an Index of Dispersion in Beliefs and find t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
166
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 318 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
7
166
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar proxies based on the options literature are used in previous studies (e.g., De Bondt (1993), Shefrin (1999), Bollen and Whaley (2004), and Buraschi and Jiltsov (2006)). The literature suggests that the SPX put volatility smirk is an effective proxy for heterogeneous beliefs between investors.…”
Section: B Implied Volatility Differential (Ivd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar proxies based on the options literature are used in previous studies (e.g., De Bondt (1993), Shefrin (1999), Bollen and Whaley (2004), and Buraschi and Jiltsov (2006)). The literature suggests that the SPX put volatility smirk is an effective proxy for heterogeneous beliefs between investors.…”
Section: B Implied Volatility Differential (Ivd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His model captures the contractions associated with the Great Depression and the two World Wars, but it does not match the evidence around the 1987 crash, when the output level remained smooth. and/or fundamentals; see, e.g., Bansal, Gallant, and Tauchen (2007), Bondarenko (2003), Brown and Jackwerth (2004), Buraschi and Jiltsov (2006), Chabi-Yo, Garcia, and Renault (2008), David and Veronesi (2002), and Garcia, Luger, and Renault (2001. These papers do not study the determinants of stock market crashes, the permanent shift in the implied volatility smirk that followed the 1987 events, and the difference between implied volatility functions for individual and index stock options.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chapter by Barone-Adesi et al (2011) in this handbook introduces a technique based on the state price density measured from stock and option data to measure fluctuations of market sentiment. In other related work, Buraschi and Jiltsov (2006) and Beber, Buraschi, and Breedon (2010) provided empirical evidence that the volatility smile of S&P500 index options and currency options is positively correlated with measures of belief dispersion.…”
Section: Endogenous Risk and Time-varying Risk Premiummentioning
confidence: 99%