UML 2 Semantics and Applications 2009
DOI: 10.1002/9780470522622.ch14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model Transformation Specification and Verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using ECL will allow the constraints specification across two different metamodel. Cariou et al (2004) supports this work and a similar approach is taken by (Lano, 2009), where a set of constraints was proposed to verify model transformations syntactic and semantic correctness.…”
Section: Verification Approachesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Using ECL will allow the constraints specification across two different metamodel. Cariou et al (2004) supports this work and a similar approach is taken by (Lano, 2009), where a set of constraints was proposed to verify model transformations syntactic and semantic correctness.…”
Section: Verification Approachesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It is no need to manually define a whole expected target model within the approach. The works in [8,28,7] employ OCL contracts or OCL assertions as partial test oracles to express the expected properties of generated models and to automatically verify them. Contracts and assertions can be represented in the form of visual graph patterns as explained in [7,31].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other situation, models in one language are transformed to models in another language that provides a semantically-similar but different representation, or adds auxiliary details that enable modelling and analysis facilities. Thus, performing transformation can be classified in several categories; refinement, quality improvement, elaboration, re-expression, abstraction and design patterns [17]. Each of these categories presents different characteristics in terms of their scope domain and abstraction levels.…”
Section: Transformation and Mde Fundamentalsmentioning
confidence: 99%