1989
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1989)115:11(1550)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model Tests of Gravity Platforms. II: Interpretation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Five 1 g laboratory model tests of an offshore gravity base structure with monotonic and cyclic loading on a soft clay (Andersen et al 1989).…”
Section: Verification By Prototype Observations and Model Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Five 1 g laboratory model tests of an offshore gravity base structure with monotonic and cyclic loading on a soft clay (Andersen et al 1989).…”
Section: Verification By Prototype Observations and Model Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Andersen 1976, Andersen 2015. The accumulation procedure has been developed and verified for the foundation design of gravity-based fixed platforms that are subjected to waves and wind of high amplitude and frequency (Andersen et al 1989),but is now also used for the foundation design of a range of offshore structures (Andersen et al 1993, Andersen et al 2013, including anchors and subsea structures that are subjected to different cyclic loading regimes to fixed platforms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21. 87,88 Excellent agreement was found between the calculated and measured sliding capacities, and there was reasonably good agreement between the calculated and measured displacements. As noted by Andersen, et al, the calculated displacements are very sensitive to some of the assessments that must be integrated into the analyses.…”
Section: Measured and Predicted Gbs Motionsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…80,86 The best information presently available to evaluate the bias and uncertainty associated with analyses of GBS foundation performance have been provided by data from 1-g and centrifuge model tests. [87][88][89][90][91][92] In the preceding and following developments on GBS sliding characteristics, the unique aspects associated with calcareous soils will not be addressed. 91,92 Results from the test series published by Andersen, et al, on cyclic loading tests on mats supported by cohesive soils are summarized in Fig.…”
Section: Measured and Predicted Gbs Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%