2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-012-0473-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model test study on the behavior of geotextile-encased sand pile in soft clay ground

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the backfill of the foundation, the calcareous sand can not only shorten the construction period but also save landfill resources, which is of great significance for the development of the modern marine economy [ 16 ]. Reviewing literature revealed that the studies on the bearing characteristics of pile foundation mainly focuses on clay [ 17 , 18 , 19 ], ordinary sand [ 20 , 21 , 22 ], loess [ 23 ], saline soil [ 24 ]. and other areas [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the backfill of the foundation, the calcareous sand can not only shorten the construction period but also save landfill resources, which is of great significance for the development of the modern marine economy [ 16 ]. Reviewing literature revealed that the studies on the bearing characteristics of pile foundation mainly focuses on clay [ 17 , 18 , 19 ], ordinary sand [ 20 , 21 , 22 ], loess [ 23 ], saline soil [ 24 ]. and other areas [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such types of soils, insufficient confinement requirements can be persuaded by encasing the column with the proper type of geosynthetics [4][5]. The impact of geosynthetic stiffness increment on ultimate load capacity improvement, settlement, and bulging reduction of geosynthetic encased columns (GECs), and excess pore water pressure change in the soft ground was investigated through the field and scaled laboratory experiments [6][7][8][9]. Murugesan and Rajagopal (2007) asserted that the most effective parameter of the instrumented GECs was the tensile strength of encasement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Murugesan and Rajagopal (2010) examined the influence of material properties and the geometry of the model for both encased and non-encased stone columns in a large-scale laboratory test setup and suggested design codes for specific load and settlement conditions [8]. Yoo et al (2015) conducted loading tests on an artificially sedimented clay ground reinforced by geotextile-encased sand piles (GESP) and conventional sand compaction piles (SCP). Results show that the failure mode of SCPs is bulging where it is buckling for GESPs thus, the geosynthetic stiffness has nearly no effect on the load-carrying capacity in the buckling failure [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment of liquefiable soil layers occurs during the construction stage, and appropriate countermeasures are taken to reinforce the soft soil in the foundation. Gravel piles and compacted sand piles are the most common treatment methods in engineering practice; they can effectively discharge pore water in the soil around the pile to reinforce the foundation [6][7][8][9]. However, for buildings that require a high bearing capacity, other pile types must be used to meet the bearing capacity requirement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%