Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Abstractα2-adrenergic receptors play a key role in the regulation of sympathetic system, neurotransmitter release, blood pressure and intraocular pressure. Although α2-adrenergic receptors mediate a number of physiological functions in vivo and have great therapeutic potential, the absence of crystal structure of α2-adrenergic receptor subtypes is a major hindrance in the drug design efforts. The therapeutic efficacy of the available drugs is not selective for subtype specificity (α2a, α2b and α2c) leading to unwanted side effects. We used Homology modelling and docking studies to understand and analyze the residues important for agonist and antagonist binding. We have also analyzed binding site volume, and the residue variations which may play important role in ligand binding. We have identified residues through our modelling and docking studies, which would be critical in giving subtype specificity and may help in the development of future subtype-selective drugs. Homology Modelling and Docking Studies of Human a2-Adrenergic Receptor SubtypesArchana Jayaraman, Kaiser Jamil and Kavita K Kakarala* [43]. Recently, the modelling groups have used β2-adrenergic receptor as a template to model subtypes of α-adrenergic receptors, as it shares higher sequence identity (29-31%) and higher transmembrane identity (37-43%) with α2-ARs [44][45][46].The structure of the Human Dopamine D3 receptor was available very recently [31]. We have modelled α2-ARs using Human Dopamine D3 receptor in complex with a D2/D3 selective antagonist (PDB ID: 3PBL) as template structure. The sequence identity and transmembrane identity of Human dopamine D3 receptor (α2a: 34%,49% ; α2b: 32%,49%; α2c: 34%,49%) was higher than β2-adrenergic receptor (PDB ID: 2RH1) (α2a: 31%, 42% ; α2b: 28%,41%; α2c: 29%,42%), Human Histamine H1 receptor complexed with doxepin (PDB ID: 3RZE), M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (PDB ID: 4DAJ), Mu-opioid receptor (PDB ID: 4DKL), a lipid G protein-coupled receptor (PDB ID: 3V2W), M2 muscarinic receptor bound to antagonist 3-quinuclidinyl-benzilate (PDB ID: 3UON), Kappa opioid in complex with JDTic (PDB ID: 4DJH), 5-hydroxytryptamine 1b in complex with dihydroergotamine (PDB ID: 4IAQ), 5-hydroxytryptamine 2b in complex with ergotamine (PDB ID: 4IB4), Delta opioid bound to naltrindole (PDB ID: 4EJ4), Neurotensin receptor 1 in complex with neurotensin (PDB ID: 4GRV), chemokine CXCR1 in phospholipid bilayers (PDB ID: 2LNL) and Protease activated receptor 1 bound with antagonist vorapaxar (PDB ID: 3VW7) ( Table 1). The models of α2-ARs namely α2-a, α2-b, α2-c were minimized and checked for stereochemical correctness then docked with ligands reported to interact with alpha adrenergic receptors using Glide. As the available models of α2a-, α2b-and α2c-ARs was based on either rhodopsin or β-adrenergic receptor, we suggest that the model based on Dopamine may prove better than rhodopsin/ beta adrenergic based model in predicting residues important for subtype specificity, as it shares more sequence identity in the transmembr...
Abstractα2-adrenergic receptors play a key role in the regulation of sympathetic system, neurotransmitter release, blood pressure and intraocular pressure. Although α2-adrenergic receptors mediate a number of physiological functions in vivo and have great therapeutic potential, the absence of crystal structure of α2-adrenergic receptor subtypes is a major hindrance in the drug design efforts. The therapeutic efficacy of the available drugs is not selective for subtype specificity (α2a, α2b and α2c) leading to unwanted side effects. We used Homology modelling and docking studies to understand and analyze the residues important for agonist and antagonist binding. We have also analyzed binding site volume, and the residue variations which may play important role in ligand binding. We have identified residues through our modelling and docking studies, which would be critical in giving subtype specificity and may help in the development of future subtype-selective drugs. Homology Modelling and Docking Studies of Human a2-Adrenergic Receptor SubtypesArchana Jayaraman, Kaiser Jamil and Kavita K Kakarala* [43]. Recently, the modelling groups have used β2-adrenergic receptor as a template to model subtypes of α-adrenergic receptors, as it shares higher sequence identity (29-31%) and higher transmembrane identity (37-43%) with α2-ARs [44][45][46].The structure of the Human Dopamine D3 receptor was available very recently [31]. We have modelled α2-ARs using Human Dopamine D3 receptor in complex with a D2/D3 selective antagonist (PDB ID: 3PBL) as template structure. The sequence identity and transmembrane identity of Human dopamine D3 receptor (α2a: 34%,49% ; α2b: 32%,49%; α2c: 34%,49%) was higher than β2-adrenergic receptor (PDB ID: 2RH1) (α2a: 31%, 42% ; α2b: 28%,41%; α2c: 29%,42%), Human Histamine H1 receptor complexed with doxepin (PDB ID: 3RZE), M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (PDB ID: 4DAJ), Mu-opioid receptor (PDB ID: 4DKL), a lipid G protein-coupled receptor (PDB ID: 3V2W), M2 muscarinic receptor bound to antagonist 3-quinuclidinyl-benzilate (PDB ID: 3UON), Kappa opioid in complex with JDTic (PDB ID: 4DJH), 5-hydroxytryptamine 1b in complex with dihydroergotamine (PDB ID: 4IAQ), 5-hydroxytryptamine 2b in complex with ergotamine (PDB ID: 4IB4), Delta opioid bound to naltrindole (PDB ID: 4EJ4), Neurotensin receptor 1 in complex with neurotensin (PDB ID: 4GRV), chemokine CXCR1 in phospholipid bilayers (PDB ID: 2LNL) and Protease activated receptor 1 bound with antagonist vorapaxar (PDB ID: 3VW7) ( Table 1). The models of α2-ARs namely α2-a, α2-b, α2-c were minimized and checked for stereochemical correctness then docked with ligands reported to interact with alpha adrenergic receptors using Glide. As the available models of α2a-, α2b-and α2c-ARs was based on either rhodopsin or β-adrenergic receptor, we suggest that the model based on Dopamine may prove better than rhodopsin/ beta adrenergic based model in predicting residues important for subtype specificity, as it shares more sequence identity in the transmembr...
The α 2C -adrenoceptor (α 2C -AR) is regarded as one of the potential targets for antipsychotics. A few of structurally diverse α 2C -AR antagonists have been reported, among which ORM-10921, containing one rigid tetracyclic framework with two neighboring chiral centers, has exhibited remarkable antipsychotic-like effects and pro-cognitive properties in different animal models. Yet the binding mode of ORM-10921 remains elusive. In this study, all of its four stereoisomers and a set of its analogs were synthesized and in vitro evaluated for their α 2C -AR antagonist activities. The molecular docking study and hydration site analysis gave a rational explanation for the biological results, which might provide helpful insights into the binding mode and future optimization.
Dedicated to Professor E. Sylvester Vizi on the occasion of his 70th birthday.Adrenergic receptors of the a 2 type (a 2 -adrenoceptors) belong to the family of seven transmembrane-spanning G-proteinlinked receptors.[1-9] a 2 -Adrenoceptors can be grouped into three highly homologous subtypes (a 2A , a 2B , and a 2C ) and, because of the difference in pharmacology, [10] a fourth subtype (a 2D ) can be formally distinguished, though this is rather a species orthologue.In general, the a 2 -adrenoceptors are responsible for the presynaptic feedback of the release of adrenaline and noradrenaline, their physiological agonists. Although numerous findings are available on the receptor subtypes from experiments with knockout mice [11] and these results are of some relevance for human pharmacology, the similar patterns of expression of adrenergic receptors in human and mouse tissues do not guarantee similar functions. Thus, the individual roles of the three a 2 -adrenoceptor subtypes in humans have not been completely elucidated. However, the results of the reported studies do indicate (see Supporting Information) that the a 2 -adrenoceptor subtypes are involved in various important physiological processes, and further investigations of the differences in their molecular pharmacology are therefore essential.The identification of subtype-specific functions from pharmacological experiments is currently not possible because of the lack of subtype-specific ligands [3,[6][7][8] and the cross-reactivity with imidazoline receptors.[7] The development of subtype-selective agonists would be useful as it would facilitate further examinations of the molecular pharmacology of the a 2 -adrenoceptors. The rational, structure-based design of such agonists requires a precise knowledge of the molecular structure of the binding site. Unfortunately, because of the difficulties inherent in crystallization, atomic-resolution structures of the a 2 -adrenoceptors are not available in the Protein Databank.In the present study, an atomic-resolution model of the a 2A -adrenoceptor was constructed through use of its amino acid sequence and the crystallographic bovine rhodopsin structure as a template. Similar homology models were earlier constructed by other researchers [12] and successfully used to provide qualitative explanations. The a 2A -adrenoceptor model in the present study is based on a crystallographic template structure with a resolution of 2.2 [13] appropriate for quantitative investigations (for details, refer to the Computational Methods below).In possession of the atomic resolution target structure (a 2A -adrenoceptor), 15 known agonist ligands were automatically docked to the presumed binding region of the receptor (Figure 1 a). Inspection of the results revealed that the docked ligand conformations are in physical contact with the key residues D3.32A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (113), S5.42A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (200), and S5.46A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (204), previously identified by site-directed mutagenesis studies. [1...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.