2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model selection for 24/7 pig position and posture detection by 2D camera imaging and deep learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method proposed in this paper achieved a result of 2.5% higher if the sitting posture was included, and 5.3% higher if the sitting posture was not included, which proves the effectiveness of the method. Other researchers performed posture recognition from different camera views with 2D cameras [28][29][30], but the detection of sitting postures in pigs was not included in their experiments. It can be inferred that the recognition effect for sitting postures in the unmodified model shown in Table 5 was far lower than that for standing and lying postures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The method proposed in this paper achieved a result of 2.5% higher if the sitting posture was included, and 5.3% higher if the sitting posture was not included, which proves the effectiveness of the method. Other researchers performed posture recognition from different camera views with 2D cameras [28][29][30], but the detection of sitting postures in pigs was not included in their experiments. It can be inferred that the recognition effect for sitting postures in the unmodified model shown in Table 5 was far lower than that for standing and lying postures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, if models from the previous study directly recognize the sitting posture of pigs, the detection effect may decline. In the research of Riekert et al [28,29], Faster-RCNN was used to detect pig postures. As shown in Table 6, the speed of Faster-RCNN was lower than that of the method used in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…e results demonstrated that in real-world data, this method got a mean absolute error of 1.67. Riekert et al [17] used a deep learning system to detect the position and pose of pigs and achieved 84% mAP@.50 for the day and 58% mAP@.50 for the night. Although scholars have studied pig identification, the accuracy and speed of detection for pig identification are not satisfactory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%