2001
DOI: 10.1002/etc.5620200832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model selection and parameterization of the concentration‐response functions for population‐level effects

Abstract: As concentration response functions for chronic population-level effects of pollutant chemicals, three mathematical models were presented and examined for goodness of fit to published toxicological data that estimated the population-level effects of chemicals in terms of the intrinsic rate of population growth (r). Among the examined concentration-r functions, the power function model, that is, r(x) = r(0)[1 - (x/alpha)beta], in which x is the exposure concentration and alpha and beta are parameters, performed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data, along with other studies concerning population extinction [30,47,48], conclude that species subjected to more erratic environmental fluctuations will be at a greater risk of extinction. Although little information exists on the fluctuations of natural mysid populations, estuaries are characterized by marked environmental fluctuations that may lend to more stochastic abiotic conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our data, along with other studies concerning population extinction [30,47,48], conclude that species subjected to more erratic environmental fluctuations will be at a greater risk of extinction. Although little information exists on the fluctuations of natural mysid populations, estuaries are characterized by marked environmental fluctuations that may lend to more stochastic abiotic conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Extinction risk is better determined from stochastic models and is generally a function of environmental variation, carrying capacity, and population growth rate [30,47,48]. As such, they have limited power for determining extinction risk of a population exposed to sublethal pollutant concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, these models have only been tested on a few substances and species because of the large number of parameters values that has to be determined. Alternatively, empirical relationships have been derived [12]. Here, extrapolation is restricted by the lack of a mechanistic basis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the DDE concentration ( C e ) — r curve was fitted by the power function as in Equation 5. C e is the natural logarithm of the concentration (ng/g wet wt of eggs) and its increment variance r , r 0 is the intrinsic rate of increase without DDE exposure in a realistic environment, α is the concentration when r = 0, and β is the curvature of responses, indicating the nonlinearity formula [29]. The difference between r 0 and r was defined as the lost intrinsic rate of increase (Δ Z ) as in Equation 6 [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%