2010
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model quality assessment for membrane proteins

Abstract: ProQM is available as a server at +proqm.cbr.su.se+.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
84
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
84
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We then ran two "loop refinement" protocols on each of the initial models and chose the "best" on the basis of the force field energy calculated by CHARMM. To check on the validity of the best model, we separated the first (NR1) and second (NR2) subunits and submitted them to the ProQM server, a server trained on quality of membrane proteins (Ray et al, 2010). As a further improvement, the model was then optimized with CHARMM to a gradient of 0.0001 kcal/mol-Å in the presence of harmonic restraints on the backbone atoms of 10 kcal/Å 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then ran two "loop refinement" protocols on each of the initial models and chose the "best" on the basis of the force field energy calculated by CHARMM. To check on the validity of the best model, we separated the first (NR1) and second (NR2) subunits and submitted them to the ProQM server, a server trained on quality of membrane proteins (Ray et al, 2010). As a further improvement, the model was then optimized with CHARMM to a gradient of 0.0001 kcal/mol-Å in the presence of harmonic restraints on the backbone atoms of 10 kcal/Å 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This library was constructed using each amino acid sequence underlying the PDB structures and clustering over their sequences was done using CD-HIT (Li et al, 2001) to admit at least 95% sequence identity between them. MODELLER (Sali and Blundell, 1993) was used to produce several models based on this alignment and the best model was chosen using ProQM Server (Ray et al, 2010) for model quality assessment.…”
Section: Template Alignment and Model Building For S17 Acr3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 20 best-ranked structures were visually checked, resulting in the selection of four models, one for each possible TM-10 fold in both subtypes. Geometrical quality assessment was performed with PROCHECK, 27 followed by in-depth investigation using ProQM, 28 which is optimized for membrane proteins. The estimated model error was in the range of the template resolution, and significantly higher in loop regions remote from the binding event (see supporting Figure 1).…”
Section: Molecular Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%