Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) Held Jointly With 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference 2009
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2009.5399744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model predictive path-following for constrained nonlinear systems

Abstract: Abstract-We propose a model predictive control approach to path-following problems of constrained nonlinear systems. We directly consider input and state constraints. Furthermore, we introduce an extended corridor path-following problem, which allows to add spatial degrees of freedom to the path formulation. We give sufficient stability conditions for predictive solutions to 1d and corridor path-following problems. To illustrate the performance of our approach we discuss the example of an autonomous vehicle su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
89
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the majority of existing works on path-following problems focuses on geometric and Lyapunov-based methods and does not explicitly consider constraints during the controller design. Recent results explicitly consider constraints on system inputs and states in a predictive control setup Faulwasser and Findeisen (2010) ;Faulwasser et al (2009). The aforementioned results share the a priori assumption that a given path is exactly followable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the majority of existing works on path-following problems focuses on geometric and Lyapunov-based methods and does not explicitly consider constraints during the controller design. Recent results explicitly consider constraints on system inputs and states in a predictive control setup Faulwasser and Findeisen (2010) ;Faulwasser et al (2009). The aforementioned results share the a priori assumption that a given path is exactly followable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Faulwasser et al (2009). Secondly, it is in general not easy to verify that an arbitrarily shaped geometric path can be exactly followed if constraints on states and inputs are present.…”
Section: Exact Feedforward Path-followingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4], [6], [11]. Results on predictive control for path-following problems are also available [5]. So far only limited results for the application of NMPC to problems governed by time-varying dynamics are available, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In standard quasi-infinite horizon NMPC approaches ( [4], [6]) one often computes a suitable level set E = {e ∈ R n | V (t, e) ≤ c 2 } such that for all e ∈ E conditions similar to (5) hold. This is restrictive, since the level set is defined by a constant.…”
Section: B Invariant Time-varying Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10]15 The conceptual idea of path following is based on a simple observation: If the desired flight path is described as a reference trajectory it implies an explicit requirement when to be where on the reference. In a path-following setup, however, the flight path is considered as a geometric reference.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%