2013 American Control Conference 2013
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2013.6580409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model predictive control with a rigorous model of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell

Abstract: by maintaining reliability parameters during load changes. These reliability parameters are critical to maintain power generation efficiency over an extended life of the SOFC. For SOFCs to be commercially viable, the life must exceed 20,000 hours for load following applications. This is not yet achieved because transient stresses damage the fuel cell and degrade the performance over time. This study relates the development of a dynamic model for SOFC systems in order to predict optimal manipulated variable mov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To solve the problem of maintaining the output voltage and fuel utilization of SOFCs, many advanced control strategies have been proposed, such as model predictive control (MPC) [11][12][13], fuzzy proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control [14], fuzzy logic control [15], and neural network control [16]. All of these control strategies have been shown to obtain excellent control performance in numerous simulation studies: However, due to their computational complexity, these control strategies are difficult to implement in practical applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve the problem of maintaining the output voltage and fuel utilization of SOFCs, many advanced control strategies have been proposed, such as model predictive control (MPC) [11][12][13], fuzzy proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control [14], fuzzy logic control [15], and neural network control [16]. All of these control strategies have been shown to obtain excellent control performance in numerous simulation studies: However, due to their computational complexity, these control strategies are difficult to implement in practical applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, methods developed in the APMonitor Optimization Suite [5] are applied to systems biology in MATLAB, Python, or Julia programming languages. APMonitor is a software package used for applications including advanced monitoring [6], advanced control [7], unmanned aircraft systems [8,9], smart grid energy integration systems [10][11][12][13], and other applications [14,15] that utilize the simultaneous approach to dynamic optimization. The examples shown in this work are computed from the SBML database of curated models in APMonitor and MATLAB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve this trade-off, a quadratic performance index is used where the squared deviations at the end of each time interval are weighted differently (10 for setpoint deviations and 1 for manipulated variable changes) and summed to create a performance index to be minimized. This yields the dynamic optimization problem in Equation (42), which is subject to the system model in Equations 33-41 and inequality constraints on the inputs:…”
Section: Continuous Logic In An Nmpc Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 10 minute time horizon is discretized into one minute intervals and solved using a simultaneous solution method. This is done using a DAE solution package known as APMonitor [40][41][42]. This software package allows a user to define a model using both differential and algebraic equations [43,44].…”
Section: Tank With Overflowmentioning
confidence: 99%