2010
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2009.0482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model predictive control relevant identification: multiple input multiple output against multiple input single output

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Huang & Wang (1999) extended the previous method, so that a general model structure (e.g., Box-Jenkins) could be employed. Some authors, such as (Gopaluni et al, 2003;Laurí et al, 2010), deal with the parameter estimation problem directly minimizing the MRI cost function, using nonlinear optimization techniques. In another approach, proposed by Gopaluni et al (2004), the focus is given to the noise model parameter estimation.…”
Section: Model Parameter Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Huang & Wang (1999) extended the previous method, so that a general model structure (e.g., Box-Jenkins) could be employed. Some authors, such as (Gopaluni et al, 2003;Laurí et al, 2010), deal with the parameter estimation problem directly minimizing the MRI cost function, using nonlinear optimization techniques. In another approach, proposed by Gopaluni et al (2004), the focus is given to the noise model parameter estimation.…”
Section: Model Parameter Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main of them is that algorithms developed for the SISO (single-input single-output) processes can be directly generalized for the multivariable case. Nevertheless, if there are dynamic iterations between different outputs, the estimated model based on the diagonal form can present a larger bias error (Laurí et al, 2010). Alternatively, one can add elements outside the diagonal of F(q) , not necessarily monic polynomials, with the purpose of incorporating the dynamic iteration between the process outputs.…”
Section: Model Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main advantages of the MPC are that the constraints may be explicitly specified into the problem formulation and the measured disturbances can be taken into consideration [15][16][17][18]. Constraints consist of ranges of possible MPC input-output due to manipulated variables, physical limitations, operating procedures or safety reasons, etc.…”
Section: 1) Lfc By Use Of Evsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional MPC method is based on the current measurements and predictions of the future outputs [15][16][17][18][19]. The objective of the MPC is to determine a sequence of the control moves i.e., the manipulated input variable, so that the predicted response moves to the set point in an optimal manner.…”
Section: Overview Of Mpcmentioning
confidence: 99%