2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2023.104038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model predictive control policy design, solutions, and stability analysis for longitudinal vehicle control considering shockwave damping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, if the vehicles can exchange information through communication networks about their velocity, acceleration, or position, then the CACC functionality can be used to ensure improved performances obtained by the ACC. The most used approaches for the longitudinal control are also based on the MPC algorithm [62,77,78], LQR [79], and PID controllers [80]. The advantage of using the MPC strategy and vehicle communication compared to the other methods consists of the possibility to use the future actions' predictions of a neighbouring vehicle.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, if the vehicles can exchange information through communication networks about their velocity, acceleration, or position, then the CACC functionality can be used to ensure improved performances obtained by the ACC. The most used approaches for the longitudinal control are also based on the MPC algorithm [62,77,78], LQR [79], and PID controllers [80]. The advantage of using the MPC strategy and vehicle communication compared to the other methods consists of the possibility to use the future actions' predictions of a neighbouring vehicle.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Driver intention anticipation is important because only half of the drivers turn on signals before lane-change maneuvers. To predict these intentions can also reduce traffic congestion [12,13]. Although these systems are considered the lowest automation levels (Levels 1 and 2), there is evidence that they contribute to lane maintenance [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%