2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2014.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model predictive control of semiautogenous mills (sag)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability of the fractional order controllers to control the grinding mill circuit is compared to the performance of an LMPC controller. LMPC is chosen as it can be considered to be the de-facto standard for advanced process control implementations in industry [51,52], and was successfully applied to control grinding mill circuits both in simulation and practice [1,2,3,53,54]. The aim of the LMPC controller can be described as: min…”
Section: Lmpc Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of the fractional order controllers to control the grinding mill circuit is compared to the performance of an LMPC controller. LMPC is chosen as it can be considered to be the de-facto standard for advanced process control implementations in industry [51,52], and was successfully applied to control grinding mill circuits both in simulation and practice [1,2,3,53,54]. The aim of the LMPC controller can be described as: min…”
Section: Lmpc Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A SAG mill has the advantages of high operation rate, large output, and large crushing ratio, which makes SAG mills have the characteristics of short process time, low management cost, and suitability for large-scale production compared to other mills. Therefore, SAG mills are favored by large mines and are becoming more and more widely used in the mineral processing industry [1,2]. A SAG mill has low speed and heavy load, which cause the energy consumption of grinding operation to be very high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the feed ore size distribution, Amestica et al presented a dynamic model by taking the masses of water, copper rocks and granules as state variables [7], [8]. In [9], the control model was developed with taking the delivery rate of copper rocks, the feed flow rate of water and the rotation speed as control inputs and considering the power, the filling rate and particle size reduction as output variables. However, there is no sensor to measure the particle size in the SAG mill and the influence of rotation speed on the crushing rate is not considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%