2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model Predictive Control for an Inverted-pendulum Robot with Time-varying Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on Reference [30], we designed an MPC for a single-leg robot with restricted motion. Considering the similarity between the first and second joints, we rewrite decoupled linear systems (Equation ( 14)) into the state equation form for a single joint as follows:…”
Section: Control-law Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on Reference [30], we designed an MPC for a single-leg robot with restricted motion. Considering the similarity between the first and second joints, we rewrite decoupled linear systems (Equation ( 14)) into the state equation form for a single joint as follows:…”
Section: Control-law Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, with two Degrees Of Freedom (DOF); and only the horizontal force, the inverted pendulum is the simplest Underactuated Mechanical System (UMS). Therefore, the inverted pendulum seems to be the platform for the implementation of different nonlinear and linear approaches; augmented PID controller (Siradjuddin et al, 2018), fuzzy logic control (El-Bardini and El-Nagar, 2014), sliding mode (Park and Chwa, 2009), predictive control (Ohhira and Shimada, 2017), and optimal control (Prasad et al, 2014).…”
Section: Context and Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As some examples, one may point at missiles, Segways (Kim and Park, 2016) as well as biped (Bae and Oh, 2018), humanoid, and self-balancing robots (Huang and Yeh, 2019). Balancing inverted pendulum systems have always been a challenge for researchers, and novel control algorithms are regularly presented (Choi and Oh, 2008; Huang et al, 2013; Irfan et al, 2018; Johnson et al, 2020; Minatohara and Furukawa, 2011; Ohhira and Shimada, 2017; Su et al, 2016; Susanto et al, 2020) by many scientists for balancing the pendulum and controlling the cart position. In fact, balancing inverted pendulums are known as a suitable benchmark problem for investigating the applicability and robustness of different linear (Choi and Oh, 2008; Siradjuddin et al, 2017; Susanto et al, 2020) or nonlinear (Becerikli and Celik, 2007; Irfan et al, 2018; Minatohara and Furukawa, 2011; Su et al, 2016) control algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An inverted pendulum system is consisted of a cart which moves in a line and a pendulum which is supposed to be stabilized at upright position. In the simulations provided by most researchers (Aliakbari et al, 2016; Irfan et al, 2018; Kim et al, 2019; Ohhira and Shimada, 2017), the pendulum has been assumed to be rigid. Even though the inverted pendulum system with rigid pendulum has received lots of attention in prior arts, in many applications, the rigidity assumption of the pendulum bar may not be sufficiently accurate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%